[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1557130666.12778.3.camel@suse.com>
Date: Mon, 06 May 2019 10:17:46 +0200
From: Oliver Neukum <oneukum@...e.com>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, Jan.Kloetzke@...h.de
Cc: jan@...etzke.net, linux-usb@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] usbnet: fix kernel crash after disconnect
On So, 2019-05-05 at 00:45 -0700, David Miller wrote:
> From: Kloetzke Jan <Jan.Kloetzke@...h.de>
> Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2019 14:15:07 +0000
>
> > @@ -1431,6 +1432,11 @@ netdev_tx_t usbnet_start_xmit (struct sk_buff *skb,
> > spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dev->txq.lock, flags);
> > goto drop;
> > }
> > + if (WARN_ON(netif_queue_stopped(net))) {
> > + usb_autopm_put_interface_async(dev->intf);
> > + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dev->txq.lock, flags);
> > + goto drop;
> > + }
>
> If this is known to happen and is expected, then we should not warn.
>
Hi,
yes this is the point. Can ndo_start_xmit() and ndo_stop() race?
If not, why does the patch fix the observed issue and what
prevents the race? Something is not clear here.
Regards
Oliver
Powered by blists - more mailing lists