netdev - Re: [PATCH net] rhashtable: fix sparse RCU warnings on bit lock in bucket pointer

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 16 May 2019 08:19:21 -0700
From:   Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@...ronome.com>
To:     Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
Cc:     davem@...emloft.net, tgraf@...g.ch, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        oss-drivers@...ronome.com, neilb@...e.com,
        Simon Horman <simon.horman@...ronome.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] rhashtable: fix sparse RCU warnings on bit lock in
 bucket pointer

On Thu, 16 May 2019 13:16:23 +0800, Herbert Xu wrote:
> On Wed, May 15, 2019 at 01:55:01PM -0700, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> > Since the bit_spin_lock() operations don't actually dereference
> > the pointer, it's fine to forcefully drop the RCU annotation.
> > This fixes 7 sparse warnings per include site.
> > 
> > Fixes: 8f0db018006a ("rhashtable: use bit_spin_locks to protect hash bucket.")
> > Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@...ronome.com>
> > Reviewed-by: Simon Horman <simon.horman@...ronome.com>  
> 
> I don't think this is the right fix.  We should remove the __rcu
> marker from the opaque type rhash_lock_head since it cannot be
> directly dereferenced.
> 
> I'm working on a fix to this.

Make sense, anything that clears the warnings is fine with me :)

Thanks!