[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAEA6p_DGhD-nONPcjom+H3LPUVQEgHi826-We9LadrKis9NQ7A@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 15 May 2019 21:18:09 -0700
From: Wei Wang <weiwan@...gle.com>
To: David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>
Cc: Martin Lau <kafai@...com>, Wei Wang <tracywwnj@...il.com>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Mikael Magnusson <mikael.kernel@...ts.m7n.se>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] ipv6: fix src addr routing with the exception table
On Wed, May 15, 2019 at 5:07 PM David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com> wrote:
>
> On 5/15/19 6:03 PM, Wei Wang wrote:
> > Thanks Martin.
> > Changing __rt6_find_exception_xxx() might not be easy cause other
> > callers of this function does not really need to back off and use
> > another saddr.
> > And the validation of the result is a bit different for different callers.
> > What about add a new helper for the above 2 cases and just call that
> > from both places?
>
> Since this needs to be backported to stable releases, I would say
> simplest patch for that is best.
>
> I have changes queued for this area once net-next opens; I can look at
> consolidating as part of that.
Thanks David... In that case, I would prefer to stick with the current version.
Martin, what do you think?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists