netdev - Re: [RFC PATCH v2 net-next 0/3] flow_offload: Re-add per-action statistics

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20190519002218.b6bcz224jkrof7c4@salvia>
Date:   Sun, 19 May 2019 02:22:18 +0200
From:   Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org>
To:     Edward Cree <ecree@...arflare.com>
Cc:     Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@...atatu.com>, Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>,
        David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
        netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>,
        Andy Gospodarek <andy@...yhouse.net>,
        Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@...ronome.com>,
        Michael Chan <michael.chan@...adcom.com>,
        Vishal Kulkarni <vishal@...lsio.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 net-next 0/3] flow_offload: Re-add per-action
 statistics

On Fri, May 17, 2019 at 04:27:29PM +0100, Edward Cree wrote:
> On 15/05/2019 20:39, Edward Cree wrote:
[...]
> Pablo, how do the two options interact with your netfilter offload?  I'm
>  guessing it's easier for you to find a unique pointer than to generate
>  a unique u32 action_index for each action.  I'm also assuming that
>  netfilter doesn't have a notion of shared actions.

It has that shared actions concept, see:

https://netfilter.org/projects/nfacct/

Have a look at 'nfacct' in iptables-extensions(8) manpage.