netdev - Re: [PATCH iproute2 net-next] ip: add a new parameter -Numeric

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <7f9f733e-9977-1994-fe47-3a0fb4160ad4@gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 21 May 2019 15:20:11 -0600
From:   David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>
To:     Hangbin Liu <liuhangbin@...il.com>,
        Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org>
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, Phil Sutter <phil@....cc>
Subject: Re: [PATCH iproute2 net-next] ip: add a new parameter -Numeric

On 5/21/19 6:13 AM, Hangbin Liu wrote:
> BTW, for some pre-defined names in iproute2, like rtnl_rtprot_tab,
> nl_proto_tab. Should we also print the number directly or just keep
> using the human readable names?
> 
> I would like to keep them as this is defined in iproute and we can control
> them. But this may make people feel confused with the -Numeric parameter.
> So what do you think?

To me numeric means no number to string conversions, and the protocol is
passed as a number.