netdev - Re: [RFC PATCH net-next 8/9] net: dsa: Use PHYLINK for the CPU/DSA ports

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20190524131937.GB2979@lunn.ch>
Date:   Fri, 24 May 2019 15:19:37 +0200
From:   Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To:     Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>
Cc:     Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
        Ioana Ciornei <ioana.ciornei@....com>,
        "linux@...linux.org.uk" <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
        "hkallweit1@...il.com" <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
        "maxime.chevallier@...tlin.com" <maxime.chevallier@...tlin.com>,
        "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        "davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH net-next 8/9] net: dsa: Use PHYLINK for the CPU/DSA
 ports

> Hi Florian,
> 
> Yes we could, but since most of the adjust_link -> phylink_mac_ops
> changes appear trivial, and we have the knowledge behind b53 right
> here, can't we just migrate everything in the next patchset and remove
> adjust_link altogether from DSA?

I agree with Florian, we either need to support both, or their needs
to be another patchset which comes first and converts all DSA drivers
to PHYLINK. And it is this conversion patchset which is likely to
break things, so it would be good to sit in net-next for a week or two
to allow testing, before the second patchset is applied.

   Andrew