lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <bb4d491e-324a-a7b0-1e0c-a85d375f1d15@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 28 May 2019 13:43:14 -0700 From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com> To: Lawrence Brakmo <brakmo@...com>, Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>, netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org> Cc: Martin Lau <kafai@...com>, Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...com>, Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>, Kernel Team <Kernel-team@...com> Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 bpf-next 1/6] bpf: Create BPF_PROG_CGROUP_INET_EGRESS_RUN_ARRAY On 5/28/19 11:54 AM, Lawrence Brakmo wrote: > On 5/28/19, 6:43 AM, "netdev-owner@...r.kernel.org on behalf of Eric Dumazet" <netdev-owner@...r.kernel.org on behalf of eric.dumazet@...il.com> wrote: > > Why are you using preempt_enable_no_resched() here ? > > Because that is what __BPF_PROG_RUN_ARRAY() calls and the macro > BPF_PROG_CGROUP_INET_EGRESS_RUN_ARRAY() is an instantiation of it > (with minor changes in the return value). I do not see this in my tree. Please rebase your tree, do not bring back an issue that was solved already.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists