lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190529110524.GU4633@mtr-leonro.mtl.com>
Date:   Wed, 29 May 2019 14:05:24 +0300
From:   Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org>
To:     Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca>
Cc:     Doug Ledford <dledford@...hat.com>,
        RDMA mailing list <linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org>,
        Majd Dibbiny <majd@...lanox.com>,
        Mark Zhang <markz@...lanox.com>,
        Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...lanox.com>,
        linux-netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH rdma-next v2 13/17] RDMA/core: Get sum value of all
 counters when perform a sysfs stat read

On Wed, May 22, 2019 at 02:26:36PM -0300, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 29, 2019 at 11:34:49AM +0300, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> > diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/core/device.c b/drivers/infiniband/core/device.c
> > index c56ffc61ab1e..8ae4906a60e7 100644
> > +++ b/drivers/infiniband/core/device.c
> > @@ -1255,7 +1255,11 @@ int ib_register_device(struct ib_device *device, const char *name)
> >  		goto dev_cleanup;
> >  	}
> >
> > -	rdma_counter_init(device);
> > +	ret = rdma_counter_init(device);
> > +	if (ret) {
> > +		dev_warn(&device->dev, "Couldn't initialize counter\n");
> > +		goto sysfs_cleanup;
> > +	}
>
> Don't put this things randomly, if there is some reason it should be
> after sysfs it needs a comment, otherwise if it is just allocating
> memory it belongs earlier, and the unwind should be done in release.
>
> I also think it is very strange/wrong that both sysfs and counters are
> allocating the same alloc_hw_stats object
>
> Why can't they share?

They can, but we wanted to separate "legacy" counters which were exposed
through sysfs and "new" counters which can be enabled/disable automatically.

Thanks

>
> Jason

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ