lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 29 May 2019 14:15:44 +0300
From:   Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org>
To:     Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca>
Cc:     Doug Ledford <dledford@...hat.com>,
        RDMA mailing list <linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org>,
        Majd Dibbiny <majd@...lanox.com>,
        Mark Zhang <markz@...lanox.com>,
        Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...lanox.com>,
        linux-netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH rdma-next v2 13/17] RDMA/core: Get sum value of all
 counters when perform a sysfs stat read

On Wed, May 22, 2019 at 02:10:42PM -0300, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 29, 2019 at 11:34:49AM +0300, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> > From: Mark Zhang <markz@...lanox.com>
> >
> > Since a QP can only be bound to one counter, then if it is bound to a
> > separate counter, for backward compatibility purpose, the statistic
> > value must be:
> > * stat of default counter
> > + stat of all running allocated counters
> > + stat of all deallocated counters (history stats)
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Mark Zhang <markz@...lanox.com>
> > Reviewed-by: Majd Dibbiny <majd@...lanox.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@...lanox.com>
> >  drivers/infiniband/core/counters.c | 99 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> >  drivers/infiniband/core/device.c   |  8 ++-
> >  drivers/infiniband/core/sysfs.c    | 10 ++-
> >  include/rdma/rdma_counter.h        |  5 +-
> >  4 files changed, 113 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/core/counters.c b/drivers/infiniband/core/counters.c
> > index 36cd9eca1e46..f598b1cdb241 100644
> > +++ b/drivers/infiniband/core/counters.c
> > @@ -146,6 +146,20 @@ static int __rdma_counter_bind_qp(struct rdma_counter *counter,
> >  	return ret;
> >  }
> >
> > +static void counter_history_stat_update(const struct rdma_counter *counter)
> > +{
> > +	struct ib_device *dev = counter->device;
> > +	struct rdma_port_counter *port_counter;
> > +	int i;
> > +
> > +	port_counter = &dev->port_data[counter->port].port_counter;
> > +	if (!port_counter->hstats)
> > +		return;
> > +
> > +	for (i = 0; i < counter->stats->num_counters; i++)
> > +		port_counter->hstats->value[i] += counter->stats->value[i];
> > +}
> > +
> >  static int __rdma_counter_unbind_qp(struct ib_qp *qp, bool force)
> >  {
> >  	struct rdma_counter *counter = qp->counter;
> > @@ -285,8 +299,10 @@ int rdma_counter_unbind_qp(struct ib_qp *qp, bool force)
> >  		return ret;
> >
> >  	rdma_restrack_put(&counter->res);
> > -	if (atomic_dec_and_test(&counter->usecnt))
> > +	if (atomic_dec_and_test(&counter->usecnt)) {
> > +		counter_history_stat_update(counter);
> >  		rdma_counter_dealloc(counter);
> > +	}
> >
> >  	return 0;
> >  }
> > @@ -307,21 +323,98 @@ int rdma_counter_query_stats(struct rdma_counter *counter)
> >  	return ret;
> >  }
> >
> > -void rdma_counter_init(struct ib_device *dev)
> > +static u64 get_running_counters_hwstat_sum(struct ib_device *dev,
> > +					   u8 port, u32 index)
> > +{
> > +	struct rdma_restrack_entry *res;
> > +	struct rdma_restrack_root *rt;
> > +	struct rdma_counter *counter;
> > +	unsigned long id = 0;
> > +	u64 sum = 0;
> > +
> > +	rt = &dev->res[RDMA_RESTRACK_COUNTER];
> > +	xa_lock(&rt->xa);
> > +	xa_for_each(&rt->xa, id, res) {
> > +		if (!rdma_restrack_get(res))
> > +			continue;
>
> Why do we need to get refcounts if we are holding the xa_lock?

Don't we need to protect an entry itself from disappearing?

>
> > +
> > +		counter = container_of(res, struct rdma_counter, res);
> > +		if ((counter->device != dev) || (counter->port != port))
> > +			goto next;
> > +
> > +		if (rdma_counter_query_stats(counter))
> > +			goto next;
>
> And rdma_counter_query_stats does
>
> +	mutex_lock(&counter->lock);
>
> So this was never tested as it will insta-crash with lockdep.
>
> Presumably this is why it is using xa_for_each and restrack_get - but
> it needs to drop the lock after successful get.
>
> This sort of comment applies to nearly evey place in this series that
> uses xa_for_each.
>
> This needs to be tested with lockdep.

I use LOCKDEP.

>
> Jason

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ