lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Tue, 28 May 2019 21:40:59 -0700 From: Richard Cochran <richardcochran@...il.com> To: John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org> Cc: Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>, Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>, vivien.didelot@...il.com, andrew@...n.ch, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>, lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Network Development <netdev@...r.kernel.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 1/5] timecounter: Add helper for reconstructing partial timestamps On Tue, May 28, 2019 at 07:14:22PM -0700, John Stultz wrote: > Hrm. Is this actually generic? Would it make more sense to have the > specific implementations with this quirk implement this in their > read() handler? If not, why? Strongly agree that this workaround should stay in the driver. After all, we do not want to encourage HW designers to continue in this way. Thanks, Richard
Powered by blists - more mailing lists