lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Tue, 28 May 2019 21:49:12 -0700
From:   Richard Cochran <richardcochran@...il.com>
To:     Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>
Cc:     f.fainelli@...il.com, vivien.didelot@...il.com, andrew@...n.ch,
        davem@...emloft.net, john.stultz@...aro.org, tglx@...utronix.de,
        sboyd@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 3/5] net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: Let taggers specify a
 can_timestamp function

On Wed, May 29, 2019 at 02:56:25AM +0300, Vladimir Oltean wrote:
> The newly introduced function is called on both the RX and TX paths.

NAK on this patch.
 
> The boolean returned by port_txtstamp should only return false if the
> driver tried to timestamp the skb but failed.

So you say.
 
> Currently there is some logic in the mv88e6xxx driver that determines
> whether it should timestamp frames or not.
> 
> This is wasteful, because if the decision is to not timestamp them, then
> DSA will have cloned an skb and freed it immediately afterwards.

No, it isn't wasteful.  Look at the tests in that driver to see why.
 
> Additionally other drivers (sja1105) may have other hardware criteria
> for timestamping frames on RX, and the default conditions for
> timestamping a frame are too restrictive.

I'm sorry, but we won't change the frame just for one device that has
design issues.

Please put device specific workarounds into its driver.

Thanks,
Richard

Powered by blists - more mailing lists