lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Thu, 30 May 2019 11:11:24 +0200
From:   Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@....de>
To:     Josh Hunt <johunt@...mai.com>, David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] ss: add option to print socket information on one line

This software update caught also my development attention a moment ago.


> +++ b/misc/ss.c
> @@ -3973,7 +3975,10 @@ static int packet_show_sock(struct nlmsghdr *nlh, void *arg)
>
>  	if (show_details) {
>  		if (pinfo) {
> -			out("\n\tver:%d", pinfo->pdi_version);
> +			if (oneline)
> +				out(" ver:%d", pinfo->pdi_version);
> +			else
> +				out("\n\tver:%d", pinfo->pdi_version);
>  			out(" cpy_thresh:%d", pinfo->pdi_copy_thresh);
>  			out(" flags( ");
>  			if (pinfo->pdi_flags & PDI_RUNNING)

I would find it nicer to use the ternary operator here.

+			out(oneline ? " ver:%d" : "\n\tver:%d",
+			    pinfo->pdi_version);


How do you think about to use more succinct statement variants?

Regards,
Markus

Powered by blists - more mailing lists