netdev - Re: [PATCH V4 net-next 0/6] Peer to Peer One-Step time stamping

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 31 May 2019 10:57:21 -0700 (PDT)
From:   David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:     richardcochran@...il.com
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org, andrew@...n.ch,
        f.fainelli@...il.com, jacob.e.keller@...el.com,
        mark.rutland@....com, mlichvar@...hat.com, robh+dt@...nel.org,
        willemb@...gle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH V4 net-next 0/6] Peer to Peer One-Step time stamping

From: Richard Cochran <richardcochran@...il.com>
Date: Thu, 30 May 2019 22:51:32 -0700

> Anyhow, I rebased v5 of my series to latest net-next, and I'm getting
> a lot of these:
> 
> In file included from net/ipv6/af_inet6.c:45:0:
> ./include/linux/netfilter_ipv6.h: In function ‘nf_ipv6_br_defrag’:
> ./include/linux/netfilter_ipv6.h:110:9: error: implicit declaration of function ‘nf_ct_frag6_gather’; did you mean ‘nf_ct_attach’? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
>   return nf_ct_frag6_gather(net, skb, user);
>          ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>          nf_ct_attach

This should be fixed now.