netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next 0/7] net: add struct nexthop to fib{6}

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 31 May 2019 19:38:28 -0700
From:   Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To:     David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>,
        David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
        alexei.starovoitov@...il.com
Cc:     dsahern@...nel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org, idosch@...lanox.com,
        saeedm@...lanox.com, kafai@...com, weiwan@...gle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 0/7] net: add struct nexthop to fib{6}_info



On 5/31/19 7:34 PM, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> 
> 
> On 5/31/19 7:29 PM, David Ahern wrote:
>> On 5/31/19 7:04 PM, Eric Dumazet wrote:
>>>
>>> I have a bunch (about 15 ) of syzbot reports, probably caused to your latest patch series.
>>>
>>> Do we want to stabilize first, or do you expect this new patch series to fix
>>> these issues ?
>>>
>>
>> Please forward. I will take a look.
>>
> 
> I will release one of them, I suspect they are duplicates.
> 
> This is why I was looking at rt6_get_pcpu_route()
> 
> I thought we were lacking a READ_ONCE() but this does not seem needed.
> 
> https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/1108632/
> 

I will release a second report, please not they are no repro yet.