lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAM_iQpXwKtT==DU3FhZ+HTc03TV7K0LcYEEXCUb6wTStospV4A@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 4 Jun 2019 10:41:58 -0700
From:   Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>
To:     Eli Britstein <elibr@...lanox.com>
Cc:     Davide Caratti <dcaratti@...hat.com>,
        Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>,
        Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>,
        Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@...atatu.com>,
        "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Linux Kernel Network Developers <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        Shuang Li <shuali@...hat.com>,
        Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net v3 1/3] net/sched: act_csum: pull all VLAN headers
 before checksumming

On Sat, Jun 1, 2019 at 9:22 PM Eli Britstein <elibr@...lanox.com> wrote:
>
>
> On 6/1/2019 1:50 AM, Cong Wang wrote:
> > On Fri, May 31, 2019 at 3:01 PM Davide Caratti <dcaratti@...hat.com> wrote:
> >> Please note: this loop was here also before this patch (the 'goto again;'
> >> line is only patch context). It has been introduced with commit
> >> 2ecba2d1e45b ("net: sched: act_csum: Fix csum calc for tagged packets").
> >>
> > This is exactly why I ask...
> >
> >
> >>> Why do you still need to loop here? tc_skb_pull_vlans() already
> >>> contains a loop to pop all vlan tags?
> >> The reason why the loop is here is:
> >> 1) in case there is a stripped vlan tag, it replaces tc_skb_protocol(skb)
> >> with the inner ethertype (i.e. skb->protocol)
> >>
> >> 2) in case there is one or more unstripped VLAN tags, it pulls them. At
> >> the last iteration, when it does:
> > Let me ask it in another way:
> >
> > The original code, without your patch, has a loop (the "goto again") to
> > pop all vlan tags.
> >
> > The code with your patch adds yet another loop (the while loop inside your
> > tc_skb_pull_vlans()) to pop all vlan tags.
> >
> > So, after your patch, we have both loops. So, I am confused why we need
> > these two nested loops to just pop all vlan tags? I think one is sufficient.
> After Davide's patch, the "goto again" is needed to re-enter the switch
> case, and guaranteed to be done only once, as all the VLAN tags were
> already pulled. The alternative is having a dedicated if before the switch.

Yeah, I think that can be simply moved before the switch so
that we don't have to use two loops, which should be easier to
understand too.

Thanks.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ