[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87ef49nsxl.fsf@tarshish>
Date: Tue, 04 Jun 2019 20:47:50 +0300
From: Baruch Siach <baruch@...s.co.il>
To: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, Aya Levin <ayal@...lanox.com>,
Moshe Shemesh <moshe@...lanox.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] devlink: fix libc and kernel headers collision
Hi Stephen,
On Tue, Jun 04 2019, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> On Thu, 30 May 2019 18:32:27 +0300
> Baruch Siach <baruch@...s.co.il> wrote:
>
>> Since commit 2f1242efe9d ("devlink: Add devlink health show command") we
>> use the sys/sysinfo.h header for the sysinfo(2) system call. But since
>> iproute2 carries a local version of the kernel struct sysinfo, this
>> causes a collision with libc that do not rely on kernel defined sysinfo
>> like musl libc:
>>
>> In file included from devlink.c:25:0:
>> .../sysroot/usr/include/sys/sysinfo.h:10:8: error: redefinition of 'struct sysinfo'
>> struct sysinfo {
>> ^~~~~~~
>> In file included from ../include/uapi/linux/kernel.h:5:0,
>> from ../include/uapi/linux/netlink.h:5,
>> from ../include/uapi/linux/genetlink.h:6,
>> from devlink.c:21:
>> ../include/uapi/linux/sysinfo.h:8:8: note: originally defined here
>> struct sysinfo {
>> ^~~~~~~
>>
>> Rely on the kernel header alone to avoid kernel and userspace headers
>> collision of definitions.
>>
>> Cc: Aya Levin <ayal@...lanox.com>
>> Cc: Moshe Shemesh <moshe@...lanox.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Baruch Siach <baruch@...s.co.il>
>
> Sorry this breaks the glibc build.
>
>
> CC devlink.o
> devlink.c: In function ‘format_logtime’:
> devlink.c:6124:8: warning: implicit declaration of function ‘sysinfo’; did you mean ‘psiginfo’? [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
> err = sysinfo(&s_info);
> ^~~~~~~
> psiginfo
>
> I backed out the patch now (before pushing it).
> Please fix and resubmit.
I can't think of anything better than this ugly fix:
diff --git a/devlink/devlink.c b/devlink/devlink.c
index 436935f88bda..02e648ef64b3 100644
--- a/devlink/devlink.c
+++ b/devlink/devlink.c
@@ -18,11 +18,12 @@
#include <limits.h>
#include <errno.h>
#include <inttypes.h>
+#include <sys/sysinfo.h>
+#define _LINUX_SYSINFO_H
#include <linux/genetlink.h>
#include <linux/devlink.h>
#include <libmnl/libmnl.h>
#include <netinet/ether.h>
-#include <sys/sysinfo.h>
#include <sys/queue.h>
#include "SNAPSHOT.h"
Would that be acceptable?
baruch
--
http://baruch.siach.name/blog/ ~. .~ Tk Open Systems
=}------------------------------------------------ooO--U--Ooo------------{=
- baruch@...s.co.il - tel: +972.52.368.4656, http://www.tkos.co.il -
Powered by blists - more mailing lists