netdev - Re: [RFC v2 PATCH 1/5] seg6: Fix TLV definitions

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAPDqMerV80=wyF62XHZVMxdmEPsU73msjZJ7ZFSayNmgGuvQLw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Sat, 8 Jun 2019 08:03:45 -0700
From:   Tom Herbert <tom@...ntonium.net>
To:     David Lebrun <dav.lebrun@...il.com>
Cc:     Tom Herbert <tom@...bertland.com>,
        "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Linux Kernel Network Developers <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        David Lebrun <dlebrun@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC v2 PATCH 1/5] seg6: Fix TLV definitions

On Sat, Jun 8, 2019 at 2:50 AM David Lebrun <dav.lebrun@...il.com> wrote:
>
> On 07/06/2019 19:55, Tom Herbert wrote:
> > -#define SR6_TLV_PADDING              4
>
>  From a uapi perspective, should we rather keep the definition and mark
> it as obsoleted as for the rest of the TLV types ?
>
Yes, that is an omission.

> Note that I'm fine with both.