[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190610142502.GF28724@lunn.ch>
Date: Mon, 10 Jun 2019 16:25:02 +0200
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...tlin.com>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Frank Rowand <frowand.list@...il.com>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>,
Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com>,
Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@...com>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com,
Maxime Chevallier <maxime.chevallier@...tlin.com>,
Antoine Ténart <antoine.tenart@...tlin.com>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 04/11] dt-bindings: net: phy: The interrupt property
is not mandatory
On Mon, Jun 10, 2019 at 11:25:43AM +0200, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> Unlike what was initially claimed in the PHY binding, the interrupt
> property of a PHY can be omitted, and the OS will turn to polling instead.
>
> Document that.
Ah!
Reviewed-by: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
Andrew
Powered by blists - more mailing lists