netdev - Re: [PATCH v2 05/11] dt-bindings: net: sun4i-emac: Convert the binding to a schemas

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20190610143139.GG28724@lunn.ch>
Date:   Mon, 10 Jun 2019 16:31:39 +0200
From:   Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To:     Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...tlin.com>
Cc:     Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Frank Rowand <frowand.list@...il.com>,
        "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>,
        Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com>,
        Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@...com>,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com,
        Maxime Chevallier <maxime.chevallier@...tlin.com>,
        Antoine Ténart <antoine.tenart@...tlin.com>,
        Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
        Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 05/11] dt-bindings: net: sun4i-emac: Convert the
 binding to a schemas

> +required:
> +  - compatible
> +  - reg
> +  - interrupts
> +  - clocks
> +  - phy
> +  - allwinner,sram

Quoting ethernet.txt:

- phy: the same as "phy-handle" property, not recommended for new bindings.

- phy-handle: phandle, specifies a reference to a node representing a PHY
  device; this property is described in the Devicetree Specification and so
  preferred;

Can this be expressed in Yaml? Accept phy, but give a warning. Accept
phy-handle without a warning? Enforce that one or the other is
present?

Thanks
	Andrew