[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190610211133.GC2191@lunn.ch>
Date: Mon, 10 Jun 2019 23:11:33 +0200
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To: Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>
Cc: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Ioana Ciornei <ioana.ciornei@....com>,
Russell King <rmk+kernel@...linux.org.uk>,
Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@...il.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] net: dsa: Deal with non-existing PHY/fixed-link
> Hi Florian,
>
> Can you give an example of when this is a valid use case, and why
> fixed-link is not appropriate?
A DSA link is used to connect two switches together. ZII devel b and c
are two boards which does this. Such links have the MACs connected
back to back, no PHYs involved. You can also connect a SoC interface
to the CPU port of a switch without having PHYs involved.
We have defined that CPU and DSA ports are always configured by the
driver to there maximum speed. Because of this, you often don't need a
fixed-link on CPU or DSA ports. So you will see most DT blobs don't
have any sort of PHY for the CPU or DSA ports.
You only need fixed-link when you need to slow a port down, e.g. a SoC
FE port connected to a switch 1G port.
Andrew
Powered by blists - more mailing lists