lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Fri, 14 Jun 2019 17:04:33 -0700
From:   Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com>
To:     Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Cc:     Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
        "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        Willem de Bruijn <willemb@...gle.com>,
        Feng Tang <feng.tang@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net 1/4] sysctl: define proc_do_static_key()

On Fri, Jun 14, 2019 at 4:55 PM Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com> wrote:
>
> On 6/14/19 4:45 PM, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
> > On Fri, Jun 14, 2019 at 04:22:18PM -0700, Eric Dumazet wrote:
>
> > maxlen is ignored by proc_do_static_key(), right?
>
> That is right, I was not sure putting a zero or sizeof(int)
> would make sense here.
>
> Using sizeof(...key) is consistent with other sysctls,

yes. that makes sense. I was just curious whether I missed something.

> even of proc_do_static_key() uses a temporary structure and
> a temporary integer in its current implementation.

yep.
Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ