lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Sun, 16 Jun 2019 12:39:40 +0200
From:   Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>
To:     Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org>
Cc:     Parav Pandit <parav@...lanox.com>,
        Doug Ledford <dledford@...hat.com>,
        Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...lanox.com>,
        RDMA mailing list <linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org>,
        Maor Gottlieb <maorg@...lanox.com>,
        Mark Bloch <markb@...lanox.com>, Petr Vorel <pvorel@...e.cz>,
        Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...lanox.com>,
        linux-netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        Jiri Pirko <jiri@...lanox.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH mlx5-next v1 1/4] net/mlx5: Declare more strictly devlink
 encap mode

Sun, Jun 16, 2019 at 12:15:07PM CEST, leon@...nel.org wrote:
>On Sun, Jun 16, 2019 at 12:07:07PM +0200, Jiri Pirko wrote:
>> Thu, Jun 13, 2019 at 07:59:54AM CEST, leon@...nel.org wrote:
>> >On Thu, Jun 13, 2019 at 04:32:25AM +0000, Parav Pandit wrote:
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> > -----Original Message-----
>> >> > From: Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org>
>> >> > Sent: Wednesday, June 12, 2019 5:50 PM
>> >> > To: Doug Ledford <dledford@...hat.com>; Jason Gunthorpe
>> >> > <jgg@...lanox.com>
>> >> > Cc: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@...lanox.com>; RDMA mailing list <linux-
>> >> > rdma@...r.kernel.org>; Maor Gottlieb <maorg@...lanox.com>; Mark Bloch
>> >> > <markb@...lanox.com>; Parav Pandit <parav@...lanox.com>; Petr Vorel
>> >> > <pvorel@...e.cz>; Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...lanox.com>; linux-
>> >> > netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>; Jiri Pirko <jiri@...lanox.com>
>> >> > Subject: [PATCH mlx5-next v1 1/4] net/mlx5: Declare more strictly devlink
>> >> > encap mode
>> >> >
>> >> > From: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@...lanox.com>
>> >> >
>> >> > Devlink has UAPI declaration for encap mode, so there is no need to be
>> >> > loose on the data get/set by drivers.
>> >> >
>> >> > Update call sites to use enum devlink_eswitch_encap_mode instead of plain
>> >> > u8.
>> >> >
>> >> > Suggested-by: Parav Pandit <parav@...lanox.com>
>> >> > Signed-off-by: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@...lanox.com>
>> >> > ---
>> >> >  drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/eswitch.h         | 8 +++++---
>> >> >  .../net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/eswitch_offloads.c    | 6 ++++--
>> >> >  include/net/devlink.h                                     | 6 ++++--
>> >> >  net/core/devlink.c                                        | 6 ++++--
>> >> >  4 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>> >> >
>> >> > diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/eswitch.h
>> >> > b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/eswitch.h
>> >> > index ed3fad689ec9..e264dfc64a6e 100644
>> >> > --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/eswitch.h
>> >> > +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/eswitch.h
>> >> > @@ -175,7 +175,7 @@ struct mlx5_esw_offload {
>> >> >  	DECLARE_HASHTABLE(mod_hdr_tbl, 8);
>> >> >  	u8 inline_mode;
>> >> >  	u64 num_flows;
>> >> > -	u8 encap;
>> >> > +	enum devlink_eswitch_encap_mode encap;
>> >> >  };
>> >> >
>> >> >  /* E-Switch MC FDB table hash node */
>> >> > @@ -356,9 +356,11 @@ int mlx5_devlink_eswitch_inline_mode_set(struct
>> >> > devlink *devlink, u8 mode,
>> >> >  					 struct netlink_ext_ack *extack);
>> >> >  int mlx5_devlink_eswitch_inline_mode_get(struct devlink *devlink, u8
>> >> > *mode);  int mlx5_eswitch_inline_mode_get(struct mlx5_eswitch *esw, int
>> >> > nvfs, u8 *mode); -int mlx5_devlink_eswitch_encap_mode_set(struct devlink
>> >> > *devlink, u8 encap,
>> >> > +int mlx5_devlink_eswitch_encap_mode_set(struct devlink *devlink,
>> >> > +					enum devlink_eswitch_encap_mode
>> >> > encap,
>> >> >  					struct netlink_ext_ack *extack);
>> >> > -int mlx5_devlink_eswitch_encap_mode_get(struct devlink *devlink, u8
>> >> > *encap);
>> >> > +int mlx5_devlink_eswitch_encap_mode_get(struct devlink *devlink,
>> >> > +					enum devlink_eswitch_encap_mode
>> >> > *encap);
>> >> >  void *mlx5_eswitch_get_uplink_priv(struct mlx5_eswitch *esw, u8
>> >> > rep_type);
>> >> >
>> >> >  int mlx5_eswitch_add_vlan_action(struct mlx5_eswitch *esw, diff --git
>> >> > a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/eswitch_offloads.c
>> >> > b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/eswitch_offloads.c
>> >> > index e09ae27485ee..f1571163143d 100644
>> >> > --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/eswitch_offloads.c
>> >> > +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/eswitch_offloads.c
>> >> > @@ -2137,7 +2137,8 @@ int mlx5_eswitch_inline_mode_get(struct
>> >> > mlx5_eswitch *esw, int nvfs, u8 *mode)
>> >> >  	return 0;
>> >> >  }
>> >> >
>> >> > -int mlx5_devlink_eswitch_encap_mode_set(struct devlink *devlink, u8
>> >> > encap,
>> >> > +int mlx5_devlink_eswitch_encap_mode_set(struct devlink *devlink,
>> >> > +					enum devlink_eswitch_encap_mode
>> >> > encap,
>> >> >  					struct netlink_ext_ack *extack)
>> >> >  {
>> >> >  	struct mlx5_core_dev *dev = devlink_priv(devlink); @@ -2186,7
>> >> > +2187,8 @@ int mlx5_devlink_eswitch_encap_mode_set(struct devlink
>> >> > *devlink, u8 encap,
>> >> >  	return err;
>> >> >  }
>> >> >
>> >> > -int mlx5_devlink_eswitch_encap_mode_get(struct devlink *devlink, u8
>> >> > *encap)
>> >> > +int mlx5_devlink_eswitch_encap_mode_get(struct devlink *devlink,
>> >> > +					enum devlink_eswitch_encap_mode
>> >> > *encap)
>> >> >  {
>> >> >  	struct mlx5_core_dev *dev = devlink_priv(devlink);
>> >> >  	struct mlx5_eswitch *esw = dev->priv.eswitch; diff --git
>> >> > a/include/net/devlink.h b/include/net/devlink.h index
>> >> > 1c4adfb4195a..7a34fc586def 100644
>> >> > --- a/include/net/devlink.h
>> >> > +++ b/include/net/devlink.h
>> >> > @@ -530,8 +530,10 @@ struct devlink_ops {
>> >> >  	int (*eswitch_inline_mode_get)(struct devlink *devlink, u8
>> >> > *p_inline_mode);
>> >> >  	int (*eswitch_inline_mode_set)(struct devlink *devlink, u8
>> >> > inline_mode,
>> >> >  				       struct netlink_ext_ack *extack);
>> >> > -	int (*eswitch_encap_mode_get)(struct devlink *devlink, u8
>> >> > *p_encap_mode);
>> >> > -	int (*eswitch_encap_mode_set)(struct devlink *devlink, u8
>> >> > encap_mode,
>> >> > +	int (*eswitch_encap_mode_get)(struct devlink *devlink,
>> >> > +				      enum devlink_eswitch_encap_mode
>> >> > *p_encap_mode);
>> >> > +	int (*eswitch_encap_mode_set)(struct devlink *devlink,
>> >> > +				      enum devlink_eswitch_encap_mode
>> >> > encap_mode,
>> >> >  				      struct netlink_ext_ack *extack);
>> >> >  	int (*info_get)(struct devlink *devlink, struct devlink_info_req *req,
>> >> >  			struct netlink_ext_ack *extack);
>> >> > diff --git a/net/core/devlink.c b/net/core/devlink.c index
>> >> > d43bc52b8840..47ae69363b07 100644
>> >> > --- a/net/core/devlink.c
>> >> > +++ b/net/core/devlink.c
>> >> > @@ -1552,7 +1552,8 @@ static int devlink_nl_eswitch_fill(struct sk_buff
>> >> > *msg, struct devlink *devlink,
>> >> >  				   u32 seq, int flags)
>> >> >  {
>> >> >  	const struct devlink_ops *ops = devlink->ops;
>> >> > -	u8 inline_mode, encap_mode;
>> >> > +	enum devlink_eswitch_encap_mode encap_mode;
>> >> > +	u8 inline_mode;
>> >> >  	void *hdr;
>> >> >  	int err = 0;
>> >> >  	u16 mode;
>> >> > @@ -1628,7 +1629,8 @@ static int devlink_nl_cmd_eswitch_set_doit(struct
>> >> > sk_buff *skb,  {
>> >> >  	struct devlink *devlink = info->user_ptr[0];
>> >> >  	const struct devlink_ops *ops = devlink->ops;
>> >> > -	u8 inline_mode, encap_mode;
>> >> > +	enum devlink_eswitch_encap_mode encap_mode;
>> >> > +	u8 inline_mode;
>> >> >  	int err = 0;
>> >> >  	u16 mode;
>> >> >
>> >> > --
>> >> > 2.20.1
>> >>
>> >> Netdev follows reverse Christmas tree, but otherwise,
>> >
>> >It was before this patch, if Jiri is ok with that, I'll change this
>> >"const struct devlink_ops *ops = devlink->ops;" line while I'll apply
>> >this patchset to mlx5-net. If not, I'll leave it as is.
>>
>> Change to what? I don't follow. The patch looks completely fine to me as
>> it is.
>
>Thanks Jiri,
>
>Parav mentioned that two lines above my change were already not in Christmas
>tree format.
>
>   struct devlink *devlink = info->user_ptr[0];
>   const struct devlink_ops *ops = devlink->ops;

As there is a dependency between those 2 lines, I don't see how you can
fix this.


>
>Thanks
>
>>
>> Acked-by: Jiri Pirko <jiri@...lanox.com>
>>
>>
>>
>> >
>> >> Reviewed-by: Parav Pandit <parav@...lanox.com>
>> >
>> >Thanks
>> >
>> >>

Powered by blists - more mailing lists