| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20190616105327.GG4694@mtr-leonro.mtl.com>
Date: Sun, 16 Jun 2019 13:53:27 +0300
From: Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org>
To: Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>
Cc: Parav Pandit <parav@...lanox.com>,
Doug Ledford <dledford@...hat.com>,
Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...lanox.com>,
RDMA mailing list <linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org>,
Maor Gottlieb <maorg@...lanox.com>,
Mark Bloch <markb@...lanox.com>, Petr Vorel <pvorel@...e.cz>,
Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...lanox.com>,
linux-netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Jiri Pirko <jiri@...lanox.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH mlx5-next v1 1/4] net/mlx5: Declare more strictly devlink
encap mode
On Sun, Jun 16, 2019 at 12:39:40PM +0200, Jiri Pirko wrote:
> Sun, Jun 16, 2019 at 12:15:07PM CEST, leon@...nel.org wrote:
> >On Sun, Jun 16, 2019 at 12:07:07PM +0200, Jiri Pirko wrote:
> >> Thu, Jun 13, 2019 at 07:59:54AM CEST, leon@...nel.org wrote:
> >> >On Thu, Jun 13, 2019 at 04:32:25AM +0000, Parav Pandit wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> > -----Original Message-----
> >> >> > From: Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org>
> >> >> > Sent: Wednesday, June 12, 2019 5:50 PM
> >> >> > To: Doug Ledford <dledford@...hat.com>; Jason Gunthorpe
> >> >> > <jgg@...lanox.com>
> >> >> > Cc: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@...lanox.com>; RDMA mailing list <linux-
> >> >> > rdma@...r.kernel.org>; Maor Gottlieb <maorg@...lanox.com>; Mark Bloch
> >> >> > <markb@...lanox.com>; Parav Pandit <parav@...lanox.com>; Petr Vorel
> >> >> > <pvorel@...e.cz>; Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...lanox.com>; linux-
> >> >> > netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>; Jiri Pirko <jiri@...lanox.com>
> >> >> > Subject: [PATCH mlx5-next v1 1/4] net/mlx5: Declare more strictly devlink
> >> >> > encap mode
> >> >> >
> >> >> > From: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@...lanox.com>
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Devlink has UAPI declaration for encap mode, so there is no need to be
> >> >> > loose on the data get/set by drivers.
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Update call sites to use enum devlink_eswitch_encap_mode instead of plain
> >> >> > u8.
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Suggested-by: Parav Pandit <parav@...lanox.com>
> >> >> > Signed-off-by: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@...lanox.com>
> >> >> > ---
> >> >> > drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/eswitch.h | 8 +++++---
> >> >> > .../net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/eswitch_offloads.c | 6 ++++--
> >> >> > include/net/devlink.h | 6 ++++--
> >> >> > net/core/devlink.c | 6 ++++--
> >> >> > 4 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
> >> >> >
> >> >> > diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/eswitch.h
> >> >> > b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/eswitch.h
> >> >> > index ed3fad689ec9..e264dfc64a6e 100644
> >> >> > --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/eswitch.h
> >> >> > +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/eswitch.h
> >> >> > @@ -175,7 +175,7 @@ struct mlx5_esw_offload {
> >> >> > DECLARE_HASHTABLE(mod_hdr_tbl, 8);
> >> >> > u8 inline_mode;
> >> >> > u64 num_flows;
> >> >> > - u8 encap;
> >> >> > + enum devlink_eswitch_encap_mode encap;
> >> >> > };
> >> >> >
> >> >> > /* E-Switch MC FDB table hash node */
> >> >> > @@ -356,9 +356,11 @@ int mlx5_devlink_eswitch_inline_mode_set(struct
> >> >> > devlink *devlink, u8 mode,
> >> >> > struct netlink_ext_ack *extack);
> >> >> > int mlx5_devlink_eswitch_inline_mode_get(struct devlink *devlink, u8
> >> >> > *mode); int mlx5_eswitch_inline_mode_get(struct mlx5_eswitch *esw, int
> >> >> > nvfs, u8 *mode); -int mlx5_devlink_eswitch_encap_mode_set(struct devlink
> >> >> > *devlink, u8 encap,
> >> >> > +int mlx5_devlink_eswitch_encap_mode_set(struct devlink *devlink,
> >> >> > + enum devlink_eswitch_encap_mode
> >> >> > encap,
> >> >> > struct netlink_ext_ack *extack);
> >> >> > -int mlx5_devlink_eswitch_encap_mode_get(struct devlink *devlink, u8
> >> >> > *encap);
> >> >> > +int mlx5_devlink_eswitch_encap_mode_get(struct devlink *devlink,
> >> >> > + enum devlink_eswitch_encap_mode
> >> >> > *encap);
> >> >> > void *mlx5_eswitch_get_uplink_priv(struct mlx5_eswitch *esw, u8
> >> >> > rep_type);
> >> >> >
> >> >> > int mlx5_eswitch_add_vlan_action(struct mlx5_eswitch *esw, diff --git
> >> >> > a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/eswitch_offloads.c
> >> >> > b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/eswitch_offloads.c
> >> >> > index e09ae27485ee..f1571163143d 100644
> >> >> > --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/eswitch_offloads.c
> >> >> > +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/eswitch_offloads.c
> >> >> > @@ -2137,7 +2137,8 @@ int mlx5_eswitch_inline_mode_get(struct
> >> >> > mlx5_eswitch *esw, int nvfs, u8 *mode)
> >> >> > return 0;
> >> >> > }
> >> >> >
> >> >> > -int mlx5_devlink_eswitch_encap_mode_set(struct devlink *devlink, u8
> >> >> > encap,
> >> >> > +int mlx5_devlink_eswitch_encap_mode_set(struct devlink *devlink,
> >> >> > + enum devlink_eswitch_encap_mode
> >> >> > encap,
> >> >> > struct netlink_ext_ack *extack)
> >> >> > {
> >> >> > struct mlx5_core_dev *dev = devlink_priv(devlink); @@ -2186,7
> >> >> > +2187,8 @@ int mlx5_devlink_eswitch_encap_mode_set(struct devlink
> >> >> > *devlink, u8 encap,
> >> >> > return err;
> >> >> > }
> >> >> >
> >> >> > -int mlx5_devlink_eswitch_encap_mode_get(struct devlink *devlink, u8
> >> >> > *encap)
> >> >> > +int mlx5_devlink_eswitch_encap_mode_get(struct devlink *devlink,
> >> >> > + enum devlink_eswitch_encap_mode
> >> >> > *encap)
> >> >> > {
> >> >> > struct mlx5_core_dev *dev = devlink_priv(devlink);
> >> >> > struct mlx5_eswitch *esw = dev->priv.eswitch; diff --git
> >> >> > a/include/net/devlink.h b/include/net/devlink.h index
> >> >> > 1c4adfb4195a..7a34fc586def 100644
> >> >> > --- a/include/net/devlink.h
> >> >> > +++ b/include/net/devlink.h
> >> >> > @@ -530,8 +530,10 @@ struct devlink_ops {
> >> >> > int (*eswitch_inline_mode_get)(struct devlink *devlink, u8
> >> >> > *p_inline_mode);
> >> >> > int (*eswitch_inline_mode_set)(struct devlink *devlink, u8
> >> >> > inline_mode,
> >> >> > struct netlink_ext_ack *extack);
> >> >> > - int (*eswitch_encap_mode_get)(struct devlink *devlink, u8
> >> >> > *p_encap_mode);
> >> >> > - int (*eswitch_encap_mode_set)(struct devlink *devlink, u8
> >> >> > encap_mode,
> >> >> > + int (*eswitch_encap_mode_get)(struct devlink *devlink,
> >> >> > + enum devlink_eswitch_encap_mode
> >> >> > *p_encap_mode);
> >> >> > + int (*eswitch_encap_mode_set)(struct devlink *devlink,
> >> >> > + enum devlink_eswitch_encap_mode
> >> >> > encap_mode,
> >> >> > struct netlink_ext_ack *extack);
> >> >> > int (*info_get)(struct devlink *devlink, struct devlink_info_req *req,
> >> >> > struct netlink_ext_ack *extack);
> >> >> > diff --git a/net/core/devlink.c b/net/core/devlink.c index
> >> >> > d43bc52b8840..47ae69363b07 100644
> >> >> > --- a/net/core/devlink.c
> >> >> > +++ b/net/core/devlink.c
> >> >> > @@ -1552,7 +1552,8 @@ static int devlink_nl_eswitch_fill(struct sk_buff
> >> >> > *msg, struct devlink *devlink,
> >> >> > u32 seq, int flags)
> >> >> > {
> >> >> > const struct devlink_ops *ops = devlink->ops;
> >> >> > - u8 inline_mode, encap_mode;
> >> >> > + enum devlink_eswitch_encap_mode encap_mode;
> >> >> > + u8 inline_mode;
> >> >> > void *hdr;
> >> >> > int err = 0;
> >> >> > u16 mode;
> >> >> > @@ -1628,7 +1629,8 @@ static int devlink_nl_cmd_eswitch_set_doit(struct
> >> >> > sk_buff *skb, {
> >> >> > struct devlink *devlink = info->user_ptr[0];
> >> >> > const struct devlink_ops *ops = devlink->ops;
> >> >> > - u8 inline_mode, encap_mode;
> >> >> > + enum devlink_eswitch_encap_mode encap_mode;
> >> >> > + u8 inline_mode;
> >> >> > int err = 0;
> >> >> > u16 mode;
> >> >> >
> >> >> > --
> >> >> > 2.20.1
> >> >>
> >> >> Netdev follows reverse Christmas tree, but otherwise,
> >> >
> >> >It was before this patch, if Jiri is ok with that, I'll change this
> >> >"const struct devlink_ops *ops = devlink->ops;" line while I'll apply
> >> >this patchset to mlx5-net. If not, I'll leave it as is.
> >>
> >> Change to what? I don't follow. The patch looks completely fine to me as
> >> it is.
> >
> >Thanks Jiri,
> >
> >Parav mentioned that two lines above my change were already not in Christmas
> >tree format.
> >
> > struct devlink *devlink = info->user_ptr[0];
> > const struct devlink_ops *ops = devlink->ops;
>
> As there is a dependency between those 2 lines, I don't see how you can
> fix this.
I don't want to do it, but this is possible solution:
const struct devlink_ops *ops:
struct devlink *devlink;
..... extra declarations ....
devlink = info->user_ptr[0];
ops = devlink->ops;
... rest of the code ...
>
>
> >
> >Thanks
> >
> >>
> >> Acked-by: Jiri Pirko <jiri@...lanox.com>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> >
> >> >> Reviewed-by: Parav Pandit <parav@...lanox.com>
> >> >
> >> >Thanks
> >> >
> >> >>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists