netdev - Re: next/master boot bisection: next-20190617 on sun8i-h2-plus-orangepi-zero

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 18 Jun 2019 22:58:23 +0200
From:   Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@...glemail.com>
To:     Guillaume Tucker <guillaume.tucker@...labora.com>
Cc:     Kevin Hilman <khilman@...libre.com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        tomeu.vizoso@...labora.com, mgalka@...labora.com,
        broonie@...nel.org, matthew.hart@...aro.org,
        enric.balletbo@...labora.com, Jose Abreu <joabreu@...opsys.com>,
        Giuseppe Cavallaro <peppe.cavallaro@...com>,
        Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@...com>,
        Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com>,
        Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
        linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: next/master boot bisection: next-20190617 on sun8i-h2-plus-orangepi-zero

Hi Guillaume,

On Tue, Jun 18, 2019 at 10:53 PM Guillaume Tucker
<guillaume.tucker@...labora.com> wrote:
>
> On 18/06/2019 21:42, Martin Blumenstingl wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 18, 2019 at 6:53 PM Kevin Hilman <khilman@...libre.com> wrote:
> > [...]
> >> This seems to have broken on several sunxi SoCs, but also a MIPS SoC
> >> (pistachio_marduk):
> >>
> >> https://storage.kernelci.org/next/master/next-20190618/mips/pistachio_defconfig/gcc-8/lab-baylibre-seattle/boot-pistachio_marduk.html
> > today I learned why initializing arrays on the stack is important
> > too bad gcc didn't warn that I was about to shoot myself (or someone
> > else) in the foot :/
> >
> > I just sent a fix: [0]
> >
> > sorry for this issue and thanks to Kernel CI for even pointing out the
> > offending commit (this makes things a lot easier than just yelling
> > that "something is broken")
>
> Glad that helped :)
>
> If you would be so kind as to credit our robot friend in your
> patch, it'll be forever grateful:
>
>   Reported-by: "kernelci.org bot" <bot@...nelci.org>
sure
do you want me to re-send my other patch or should I just reply to it
adding the Reported-by tag and hope that Dave will catch it when
applying the patch?
in either case: I did mention in the patch description that Kernel CI caught it

by the way: I didn't know how to credit the Kernel CI bot.
syzbot / syzkaller makes that bit easy as it's mentioned in the
generated email, see [0] for a (random) example
have you considered adding the Reported-by to the generated email?


Martin


[0] https://lkml.org/lkml/2019/4/19/638