[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAKwvOdkqE_RVosXAe9ULePR8A37CHh6+JtDMaRAghUA41Y_+yg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2019 10:37:14 -0700
From: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Nicolas Dichtel <nicolas.dichtel@...nd.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, kbuild test robot <lkp@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net v2 1/2] ipv6: constify rt6_nexthop()
On Mon, Jun 24, 2019 at 10:22 AM David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> wrote:
>
> From: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>
> Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2019 10:17:03 -0700
>
> > On Mon, Jun 24, 2019 at 10:06 AM David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> wrote:
> >> And you mean just changing to 'const' fixes something, how?
> >
> > See the warning in the above link (assuming now you have access).
> > Assigning a non-const variable the result of a function call that
> > returns const discards the const qualifier.
>
> Ok thanks for clarifying.
>
> However I was speaking in terms of this fixing a functional bug rather
> than a loss of const warning.
The author stated that this patch was no functional change. Nicolas,
it can be helpful to include compiler warnings in the commit message
when sending warning fixes, but it's not a big deal. Thanks for
sending the patches.
--
Thanks,
~Nick Desaulniers
Powered by blists - more mailing lists