netdev - Re: [RFC PATCH 0/2] enable broadcom tagging for bcm531x5 switches

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 25 Jun 2019 11:17:03 -0700
From:   Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
To:     Benedikt Spranger <b.spranger@...utronix.de>
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>,
        Kurt Kanzenbach <kurt@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/2] enable broadcom tagging for bcm531x5 switches

On 6/25/19 4:20 AM, Benedikt Spranger wrote:
> On Sat, 22 Jun 2019 19:24:10 -0700
> Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com> wrote:
> 
>> Something like this should take care of that (untested). You might
>> have to explicitly set the IMP port (port 8) in B53_UC_FWD_EN and
>> B53_MC_FWD_EN, though since you turn on management mode, this may not
>> be required. I might have some time tomorrow to test that on a Lamobo
>> R1.
> 
> The patch work fine in a manual setup, but not with automagicaly setup
> of $DISTRO. But that is a very different story. Trying to debug whats
> going wrong there.
> 
> Thanks for the patch.
> 
> The whole setup of the switch seem to be desperate fragile. Any chance
> to get that more robust?
I don't have as much as time as I used to have (both life and work
factors) to contribute to b53, and comments like those really make me to
continue digging my cave and move away from any sort of upstream
development.

This is open source, so if you have the datasheet and feel like you do
better, please go ahead, I certainly won't object and will happily
review patches.
-- 
Florian