netdev - [RFC PATCH 0/1] Document the configuration of b53

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 27 Jun 2019 12:15:05 +0200
From:   Benedikt Spranger <b.spranger@...utronix.de>
To:     Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>,
        Kurt Kanzenbach <kurt@...utronix.de>,
        Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
        Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@...il.com>
Subject: [RFC PATCH 0/1] Document the configuration of b53

Hi,

my comment about the configuration got misunderstood.
I apologize for that.

I try to update the Debian ifupdown util to handle DSA capable
configurations. To avoid bafflement and frayed nerves I would like to get
some conclusion about the configuration of the b53. I would like to know
if this configuration can be expected to be expected to remain unchanged,
or if some parts need to be handled with more or special care.

Please consider this patch as starting/discussion point to get a quotable
reference in the kernel documentation.

This reference would ease the development and justification to upstream
changes to tools like ifupdown.

Regards
    Bene Spranger

Benedikt Spranger (1):
  Documentation: net: dsa: b53: Describe b53 configuration

 Documentation/networking/dsa/b53.rst | 300 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 300 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 Documentation/networking/dsa/b53.rst

-- 
2.20.1