[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <94b0f05e-2521-7251-ab92-b099a3cf99c9@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 1 Jul 2019 07:50:01 +0200
From: Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>
To: Karsten Wiborg <karsten.wiborg@....de>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
Cc: nic_swsd@...ltek.com, romieu@...zoreil.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: r8169 not working on 5.2.0rc6 with GPD MicroPC
On 01.07.2019 00:21, Karsten Wiborg wrote:
> Hi Heiner,
>
> On 30/06/2019 23:55, Heiner Kallweit wrote:
>> This one shows that the vendor driver (r8168) uses a random MAC address.
>> Means the driver can't read a valid MAC address from the chip, maybe due
>> to a broken BIOS.
>> Alternatively you could use r8169 and set a MAC address manually with
>> ifconfig <if> hw ether <MAC address>
> Hmm, did some more testing:
> did a rmmod r8168 and (after "un"blacklisting the r8169) modprobed the
> r8169. This time r8169 came up nicely but with a complete different MAC
> (forgot to not than one though).
> So I guess the vendor compilation did other stuff besides just compiling
> the r8168 kernel module.
>
> Did another test:
> blacklisted the r8168, renamed r8168.ko to r8168.bak, depmod -a and
> powercycled the system. Funny it came up with both r8168 and r8169
> loaded and I got my intended IP address from. DHCP, so r8168 somewhat
> got loaded and used his MAC.
> Did another rmmod r8168, rmmod r8169 and then modprobe r8169.
> Even though I did NOT configure a MAC address myself manually it came up
> with a new MAC address and of course got a dynamich IP address.
> So I don't know where the vendor somewhat changed something (with his
> compiling/installing) to the effect that r8169 now works?!?
>
When the vendor driver assigns a random MAC address, it writes it to the
chip. The related registers may be persistent (can't say exactly due to
missing documentation).
> Regards,
> Karsten
>
Heiner
Powered by blists - more mailing lists