netdev - [PATCH] xfrm: use list_for_each_entry_safe in xfrm_policy

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon,  1 Jul 2019 16:29:07 +0800
From:   Li RongQing <lirongqing@...du.com>
To:     netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] xfrm: use list_for_each_entry_safe in xfrm_policy_flush

The iterated pol maybe be freed since it is not protected
by RCU or spinlock when put it, lead to UAF, so use _safe
function to iterate over it against removal

Signed-off-by: Li RongQing <lirongqing@...du.com>
---
 net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c b/net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c
index 3235562f6588..87d770dab1f5 100644
--- a/net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c
+++ b/net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c
@@ -1772,7 +1772,7 @@ xfrm_policy_flush_secctx_check(struct net *net, u8 type, bool task_valid)
 int xfrm_policy_flush(struct net *net, u8 type, bool task_valid)
 {
 	int dir, err = 0, cnt = 0;
-	struct xfrm_policy *pol;
+	struct xfrm_policy *pol, *tmp;
 
 	spin_lock_bh(&net->xfrm.xfrm_policy_lock);
 
@@ -1781,7 +1781,7 @@ int xfrm_policy_flush(struct net *net, u8 type, bool task_valid)
 		goto out;
 
 again:
-	list_for_each_entry(pol, &net->xfrm.policy_all, walk.all) {
+	list_for_each_entry_safe(pol, tmp, &net->xfrm.policy_all, walk.all) {
 		dir = xfrm_policy_id2dir(pol->index);
 		if (pol->walk.dead ||
 		    dir >= XFRM_POLICY_MAX ||
-- 
2.16.2