[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190701084213.GJ4727@mtr-leonro.mtl.com>
Date: Mon, 1 Jul 2019 11:42:13 +0300
From: Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org>
To: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...lanox.com>
Cc: Doug Ledford <dledford@...hat.com>,
RDMA mailing list <linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org>,
Majd Dibbiny <majd@...lanox.com>,
Mark Zhang <markz@...lanox.com>,
Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...lanox.com>,
linux-netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH rdma-next v4 06/17] RDMA/counter: Add "auto"
configuration mode support
On Sun, Jun 30, 2019 at 12:40:54AM +0000, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 18, 2019 at 08:26:14PM +0300, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
>
> > +static void __rdma_counter_dealloc(struct rdma_counter *counter)
> > +{
> > + mutex_lock(&counter->lock);
> > + counter->device->ops.counter_dealloc(counter);
> > + mutex_unlock(&counter->lock);
> > +}
>
> Does this lock do anything? The kref is 0 at this point, so no other
> thread can have a pointer to this lock.
Yes, it is leftover from atomic_read implementation.
>
> > +
> > +static void rdma_counter_dealloc(struct rdma_counter *counter)
> > +{
> > + if (!counter)
> > + return;
>
> Counter is never NULL.
Ohh, right, I'll clean some code near rdma_counter_dealloc/__rdma_counter_dealloc.
Thanks
>
> Jason
Powered by blists - more mailing lists