[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <042416A5-BA37-4F07-BD59-7FA13813B8A7@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 02 Jul 2019 09:31:00 -0700
From: "Jonathan Lemon" <jonathan.lemon@...il.com>
To: "Maxim Mikityanskiy" <maximmi@...lanox.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, bjorn.topel@...el.com,
magnus.karlsson@...el.com, jakub.kicinski@...ronome.com,
jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com, kernel-team@...com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3 bpf-next] i40e: Support zero-copy XDP_TX on the RX
path for AF_XDP sockets.
On 2 Jul 2019, at 0:07, Maxim Mikityanskiy wrote:
> On 2019-06-29 01:15, Jonathan Lemon wrote:
>> + xdpf = convert_to_xdp_frame_keep_zc(xdp);
>> + if (unlikely(!xdpf))
>> + return I40E_XDP_CONSUMED;
>> + xdpf->handle = xdp->handle;
>
> Shouldn't this line belong to convert_to_xdp_frame_keep_zc (and the
> previous patch)? It looks like it's code common for all drivers, and
> also patch 1 adds the handle field, but doesn't use it, which looks weird.
Good point. I'll move it into the function.
--
Jonathan
Powered by blists - more mailing lists