netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next 1/1] qed: Add support for Timestamping the unicast PTP packets.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 02 Jul 2019 12:23:29 -0700 (PDT)
From:   David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:     skalluru@...vell.com
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, mkalderon@...vell.com, aelior@...vell.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 1/1] qed: Add support for Timestamping the
 unicast PTP packets.

From: Sudarsana Reddy Kalluru <skalluru@...vell.com>
Date: Tue, 2 Jul 2019 08:04:12 -0700

> The register definition in the header file captures more details on
> the individual bits.

Where is this register definition in the header file and why aren't
CPP defines from there being used instead of a mask constant mask?

Thanks.