netdev - RE: [PATCH net-next 1/1] qed: Add support for Timestamping the unicast PTP packets.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 3 Jul 2019 02:27:05 +0000
From:   Sudarsana Reddy Kalluru <skalluru@...vell.com>
To:     David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
CC:     "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        Michal Kalderon <mkalderon@...vell.com>,
        Ariel Elior <aelior@...vell.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH net-next 1/1] qed: Add support for Timestamping the
 unicast PTP packets.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
> Sent: Wednesday, July 3, 2019 12:53 AM
> To: Sudarsana Reddy Kalluru <skalluru@...vell.com>
> Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org; Michal Kalderon <mkalderon@...vell.com>;
> Ariel Elior <aelior@...vell.com>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 1/1] qed: Add support for Timestamping the
> unicast PTP packets.
> 
> From: Sudarsana Reddy Kalluru <skalluru@...vell.com>
> Date: Tue, 2 Jul 2019 08:04:12 -0700
> 
> > The register definition in the header file captures more details on
> > the individual bits.
> 
> Where is this register definition in the header file and why aren't CPP defines
> from there being used instead of a mask constant mask?
> 
> Thanks.
Sorry, my mistake. taking back my statement. Will send the updated patch with CPP define.