netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next v6 06/15] ethtool: netlink bitset handling

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 4 Jul 2019 14:17:18 +0200
From:   Michal Kubecek <mkubecek@...e.cz>
To:     netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>,
        Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>,
        David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@...ronome.com>,
        Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
        Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
        John Linville <linville@...driver.com>,
        Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v6 06/15] ethtool: netlink bitset handling

On Thu, Jul 04, 2019 at 02:03:02PM +0200, Johannes Berg wrote:
> On Thu, 2019-07-04 at 13:52 +0200, Michal Kubecek wrote:
> > 
> > There is still the question if it it should be implemented as a nested
> > attribute which could look like the current compact form without the
> > "list" flag (if there is no mask, it's a list). Or an unstructured data
> > block consisting of u32 bit length 
> 
> You wouldn't really need the length, since the attribute has a length
> already :-)

It has byte length, not bit length. The bitmaps we are dealing with
can have any bit length, not necessarily multiples of 8 (or even 32).

Michal