[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190704173758.6d985aa3@carbon>
Date: Thu, 4 Jul 2019 17:37:58 +0200
From: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@...hat.com>
To: Jose Abreu <Jose.Abreu@...opsys.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Joao Pinto <Joao.Pinto@...opsys.com>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Giuseppe Cavallaro <peppe.cavallaro@...com>,
Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@...com>,
Ilias Apalodimas <ilias.apalodimas@...aro.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, brouer@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 3/3] net: stmmac: Introducing support for
Page Pool
On Thu, 4 Jul 2019 17:04:14 +0200
Jose Abreu <Jose.Abreu@...opsys.com> wrote:
> @@ -1498,8 +1480,9 @@ static void free_dma_rx_desc_resources(struct stmmac_priv *priv)
> sizeof(struct dma_extended_desc),
> rx_q->dma_erx, rx_q->dma_rx_phy);
>
> - kfree(rx_q->rx_skbuff_dma);
> - kfree(rx_q->rx_skbuff);
> + kfree(rx_q->buf_pool);
> + if (rx_q->page_pool && page_pool_request_shutdown(rx_q->page_pool))
> + page_pool_free(rx_q->page_pool);
> }
> }
This code is okay, but I would likely write it as:
if (rx_q->page_pool) {
page_pool_request_shutdown(rx_q->page_pool));
page_pool_free(rx_q->page_pool);
}
Because (as you noticed) page_pool_free() have some API misuse checks,
that will get triggered, and thus provide a warning of you forget to
update this when driver evolves.
--
Best regards,
Jesper Dangaard Brouer
MSc.CS, Principal Kernel Engineer at Red Hat
LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/brouer
Powered by blists - more mailing lists