[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <BYAPR12MB3269D8AA0646A74178ED4024D3FA0@BYAPR12MB3269.namprd12.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Thu, 4 Jul 2019 15:40:45 +0000
From: Jose Abreu <Jose.Abreu@...opsys.com>
To: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@...hat.com>,
Jose Abreu <Jose.Abreu@...opsys.com>
CC: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com"
<linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Joao Pinto <Joao.Pinto@...opsys.com>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Giuseppe Cavallaro <peppe.cavallaro@...com>,
Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@...com>,
"Ilias Apalodimas" <ilias.apalodimas@...aro.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Subject: RE: [PATCH net-next v2 3/3] net: stmmac: Introducing support for Page
Pool
From: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@...hat.com>
> This code is okay, but I would likely write it as:
>
> if (rx_q->page_pool) {
> page_pool_request_shutdown(rx_q->page_pool));
> page_pool_free(rx_q->page_pool);
> }
>
> Because (as you noticed) page_pool_free() have some API misuse checks,
> that will get triggered, and thus provide a warning of you forget to
> update this when driver evolves.
Yeah, makes sense. I will update and resend. Thanks for the review!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists