| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Thu, 4 Jul 2019 20:22:44 +0300
From: Ilias Apalodimas <ilias.apalodimas@...aro.org>
To: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@...hat.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, ivan.khoronzhuk@...aro.org,
grygorii.strashko@...com, jakub.kicinski@...ronome.com,
daniel@...earbox.net, john.fastabend@...il.com, ast@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-omap@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next V2] net: core: page_pool: add user refcnt and
reintroduce page_pool_destroy
Hi Jesper,
> Jesper recently removed page_pool_destroy() (from driver invocation) and
> moved shutdown and free of page_pool into xdp_rxq_info_unreg(), in-order to
> handle in-flight packets/pages. This created an asymmetry in drivers
> create/destroy pairs.
>
> This patch reintroduce page_pool_destroy and add page_pool user refcnt.
> This serves the purpose to simplify drivers error handling as driver now
> drivers always calls page_pool_destroy() and don't need to track if
> xdp_rxq_info_reg_mem_model() was unsuccessful.
>
> This could be used for a special cases where a single RX-queue (with a single
> page_pool) provides packets for two net_device'es, and thus needs to register
> the same page_pool twice with two xdp_rxq_info structures. This use-case is
> explicitly denied in this V2 patch, as it needs more discussion upstream.
>
> This patch is primarily to ease API usage for drivers. The recently merged
> netsec driver, actually have a bug in this area, which is solved by this API
> change.
>
> This patch is a modified version of Ivan Khoronzhu's original patch.
>
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20190625175948.24771-2-ivan.khoronzhuk@linaro.org/
> Fixes: 5c67bf0ec4d0 ("net: netsec: Use page_pool API")
> Signed-off-by: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@...hat.com>
> ---
>
> I hope we can agree on this first step. Afterwards we can discuss, which is the
> best approach for Ivan's two netdev's with one RX-queue API change.
>
> drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_main.c | 6 ++---
> drivers/net/ethernet/socionext/netsec.c | 8 ++----
> include/net/page_pool.h | 26 +++++++++++++++++++++
> net/core/page_pool.c | 8 ++++++
> net/core/xdp.c | 9 +++++++
> 5 files changed, 48 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_main.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_main.c
> index 1085040675ae..ce1c7a449eae 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_main.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_main.c
> @@ -545,10 +545,8 @@ static int mlx5e_alloc_rq(struct mlx5e_channel *c,
> }
> err = xdp_rxq_info_reg_mem_model(&rq->xdp_rxq,
> MEM_TYPE_PAGE_POOL, rq->page_pool);
> - if (err) {
> - page_pool_free(rq->page_pool);
> + if (err)
> goto err_free;
> - }
>
> for (i = 0; i < wq_sz; i++) {
> if (rq->wq_type == MLX5_WQ_TYPE_LINKED_LIST_STRIDING_RQ) {
> @@ -613,6 +611,7 @@ static int mlx5e_alloc_rq(struct mlx5e_channel *c,
> if (rq->xdp_prog)
> bpf_prog_put(rq->xdp_prog);
> xdp_rxq_info_unreg(&rq->xdp_rxq);
> + page_pool_destroy(rq->page_pool);
> mlx5_wq_destroy(&rq->wq_ctrl);
>
> return err;
> @@ -643,6 +642,7 @@ static void mlx5e_free_rq(struct mlx5e_rq *rq)
> }
>
> xdp_rxq_info_unreg(&rq->xdp_rxq);
> + page_pool_destroy(rq->page_pool);
> mlx5_wq_destroy(&rq->wq_ctrl);
> }
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/socionext/netsec.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/socionext/netsec.c
> index 5544a722543f..43ab0ce90704 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/socionext/netsec.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/socionext/netsec.c
> @@ -1210,15 +1210,11 @@ static void netsec_uninit_pkt_dring(struct netsec_priv *priv, int id)
> }
> }
>
> - /* Rx is currently using page_pool
> - * since the pool is created during netsec_setup_rx_dring(), we need to
> - * free the pool manually if the registration failed
> - */
> + /* Rx is currently using page_pool */
> if (id == NETSEC_RING_RX) {
> if (xdp_rxq_info_is_reg(&dring->xdp_rxq))
> xdp_rxq_info_unreg(&dring->xdp_rxq);
> - else
> - page_pool_free(dring->page_pool);
> + page_pool_destroy(dring->page_pool);
> }
>
> memset(dring->desc, 0, sizeof(struct netsec_desc) * DESC_NUM);
> diff --git a/include/net/page_pool.h b/include/net/page_pool.h
> index ee9c871d2043..0a0984d8f5d5 100644
> --- a/include/net/page_pool.h
> +++ b/include/net/page_pool.h
> @@ -101,6 +101,12 @@ struct page_pool {
> struct ptr_ring ring;
>
> atomic_t pages_state_release_cnt;
> +
> + /* A page_pool is strictly tied to a single RX-queue being
> + * protected by NAPI, due to above pp_alloc_cache. This
> + * refcnt serves purpose is to simplify drivers error handling.
> + */
> + refcount_t user_cnt;
> };
>
> struct page *page_pool_alloc_pages(struct page_pool *pool, gfp_t gfp);
> @@ -134,6 +140,15 @@ static inline void page_pool_free(struct page_pool *pool)
> #endif
> }
>
> +/* Drivers use this instead of page_pool_free */
> +static inline void page_pool_destroy(struct page_pool *pool)
> +{
> + if (!pool)
> + return;
> +
> + page_pool_free(pool);
> +}
> +
> /* Never call this directly, use helpers below */
> void __page_pool_put_page(struct page_pool *pool,
> struct page *page, bool allow_direct);
> @@ -201,4 +216,15 @@ static inline bool is_page_pool_compiled_in(void)
> #endif
> }
>
> +static inline unsigned int page_pool_get(struct page_pool *pool)
> +{
> + refcount_inc(&pool->user_cnt);
> + return refcount_read(&pool->user_cnt);
> +}
> +
> +static inline bool page_pool_put(struct page_pool *pool)
> +{
> + return refcount_dec_and_test(&pool->user_cnt);
> +}
> +
> #endif /* _NET_PAGE_POOL_H */
> diff --git a/net/core/page_pool.c b/net/core/page_pool.c
> index b366f59885c1..3272dc7a8c81 100644
> --- a/net/core/page_pool.c
> +++ b/net/core/page_pool.c
> @@ -49,6 +49,9 @@ static int page_pool_init(struct page_pool *pool,
>
> atomic_set(&pool->pages_state_release_cnt, 0);
>
> + /* Driver calling page_pool_create() also call page_pool_destroy() */
> + refcount_set(&pool->user_cnt, 1);
> +
> if (pool->p.flags & PP_FLAG_DMA_MAP)
> get_device(pool->p.dev);
>
> @@ -70,6 +73,7 @@ struct page_pool *page_pool_create(const struct page_pool_params *params)
> kfree(pool);
> return ERR_PTR(err);
> }
> +
> return pool;
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(page_pool_create);
> @@ -356,6 +360,10 @@ static void __warn_in_flight(struct page_pool *pool)
>
> void __page_pool_free(struct page_pool *pool)
> {
> + /* Only last user actually free/release resources */
> + if (!page_pool_put(pool))
> + return;
> +
> WARN(pool->alloc.count, "API usage violation");
> WARN(!ptr_ring_empty(&pool->ring), "ptr_ring is not empty");
>
> diff --git a/net/core/xdp.c b/net/core/xdp.c
> index b29d7b513a18..57c2317d9ce5 100644
> --- a/net/core/xdp.c
> +++ b/net/core/xdp.c
> @@ -370,6 +370,15 @@ int xdp_rxq_info_reg_mem_model(struct xdp_rxq_info *xdp_rxq,
> goto err;
> }
>
> + if (type == MEM_TYPE_PAGE_POOL) {
> + if (page_pool_get(xdp_alloc->page_pool) > 2) {
> + WARN(1, "API misuse, argue to enable use-case");
> + page_pool_put(xdp_alloc->page_pool);
> + errno = -EINVAL;
> + goto err;
> + }
> + }
> +
> mutex_unlock(&mem_id_lock);
>
> trace_mem_connect(xdp_alloc, xdp_rxq);
>
For the netsec and page_pool part
Reviewed-by: Ilias Apalodimas <ilias.apalodimas@...aro.org>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists