| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Fri, 5 Jul 2019 12:19:13 -0400
From: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@....mellanox.co.il>
To: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@...hat.com>
Cc: Ivan Khoronzhuk <ivan.khoronzhuk@...aro.org>,
grygorii.strashko@...com, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-omap@...r.kernel.org, ilias.apalodimas@...aro.org,
Linux Netdev List <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@...ronome.com>,
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
Tariq Toukan <tariqt@...lanox.com>,
Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...lanox.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 net-next 1/5] net: core: page_pool: add user refcnt and
reintroduce page_pool_destroy
On Fri, Jul 5, 2019 at 3:45 AM Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@...hat.com> wrote:
>
>
> CC: Tariq + Saeed, could you please review the mlx5 part.
>
> On Fri, 5 Jul 2019 02:14:02 +0300
> Ivan Khoronzhuk <ivan.khoronzhuk@...aro.org> wrote:
>
> > Jesper recently removed page_pool_destroy() (from driver invocation)
> > and moved shutdown and free of page_pool into xdp_rxq_info_unreg(),
> > in-order to handle in-flight packets/pages. This created an asymmetry
> > in drivers create/destroy pairs.
> >
> > This patch reintroduce page_pool_destroy and add page_pool user
> > refcnt. This serves the purpose to simplify drivers error handling as
> > driver now drivers always calls page_pool_destroy() and don't need to
> > track if xdp_rxq_info_reg_mem_model() was unsuccessful.
> >
> > This could be used for a special cases where a single RX-queue (with a
> > single page_pool) provides packets for two net_device'es, and thus
> > needs to register the same page_pool twice with two xdp_rxq_info
> > structures.
> >
> > This patch is primarily to ease API usage for drivers. The recently
> > merged netsec driver, actually have a bug in this area, which is
> > solved by this API change.
> >
This patch and the mlx5 part looks good to me,
Reviewed-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...lanox.com>
> > This patch is a modified version of Ivan Khoronzhu's original patch.
> >
> > Link: https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20190625175948.24771-2-ivan.khoronzhuk@linaro.org/
> > Fixes: 5c67bf0ec4d0 ("net: netsec: Use page_pool API")
> > Signed-off-by: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@...hat.com>
> > Reviewed-by: Ilias Apalodimas <ilias.apalodimas@...aro.org>
> > Signed-off-by: Ivan Khoronzhuk <ivan.khoronzhuk@...aro.org>
>
> Acked-by: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@...hat.com>
>
> Thank you Ivan for taking this more simple approach. If we later see
> more drivers wanting this feature of a single RX-queue providing
> packets to multiple net_device'es, then we can change into your
> more generic API at XDP-reg-layer approach later. For now, we keep
> code complexity as low as possible.
>
>
> > ---
> > .../net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_main.c | 4 +--
> > drivers/net/ethernet/socionext/netsec.c | 8 ++----
> > include/net/page_pool.h | 25 +++++++++++++++++++
> > net/core/page_pool.c | 8 ++++++
> > net/core/xdp.c | 3 +++
> > 5 files changed, 40 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_main.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_main.c
> > index 2f9093ba82aa..ac882b2341d0 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_main.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_main.c
> > @@ -575,8 +575,6 @@ static int mlx5e_alloc_rq(struct mlx5e_channel *c,
> > }
> > err = xdp_rxq_info_reg_mem_model(&rq->xdp_rxq,
> > MEM_TYPE_PAGE_POOL, rq->page_pool);
> > - if (err)
> > - page_pool_free(rq->page_pool);
> > }
> > if (err)
> > goto err_free;
> > @@ -644,6 +642,7 @@ static int mlx5e_alloc_rq(struct mlx5e_channel *c,
> > if (rq->xdp_prog)
> > bpf_prog_put(rq->xdp_prog);
> > xdp_rxq_info_unreg(&rq->xdp_rxq);
> > + page_pool_destroy(rq->page_pool);
> > mlx5_wq_destroy(&rq->wq_ctrl);
> >
> > return err;
> > @@ -678,6 +677,7 @@ static void mlx5e_free_rq(struct mlx5e_rq *rq)
> > }
> >
> > xdp_rxq_info_unreg(&rq->xdp_rxq);
> > + page_pool_destroy(rq->page_pool);
> > mlx5_wq_destroy(&rq->wq_ctrl);
> > }
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/socionext/netsec.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/socionext/netsec.c
> > index 5544a722543f..43ab0ce90704 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/socionext/netsec.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/socionext/netsec.c
> > @@ -1210,15 +1210,11 @@ static void netsec_uninit_pkt_dring(struct netsec_priv *priv, int id)
> > }
> > }
> >
> > - /* Rx is currently using page_pool
> > - * since the pool is created during netsec_setup_rx_dring(), we need to
> > - * free the pool manually if the registration failed
> > - */
> > + /* Rx is currently using page_pool */
> > if (id == NETSEC_RING_RX) {
> > if (xdp_rxq_info_is_reg(&dring->xdp_rxq))
> > xdp_rxq_info_unreg(&dring->xdp_rxq);
> > - else
> > - page_pool_free(dring->page_pool);
> > + page_pool_destroy(dring->page_pool);
> > }
> >
> > memset(dring->desc, 0, sizeof(struct netsec_desc) * DESC_NUM);
> > diff --git a/include/net/page_pool.h b/include/net/page_pool.h
> > index ee9c871d2043..2cbcdbdec254 100644
> > --- a/include/net/page_pool.h
> > +++ b/include/net/page_pool.h
> > @@ -101,6 +101,12 @@ struct page_pool {
> > struct ptr_ring ring;
> >
> > atomic_t pages_state_release_cnt;
> > +
> > + /* A page_pool is strictly tied to a single RX-queue being
> > + * protected by NAPI, due to above pp_alloc_cache. This
> > + * refcnt serves purpose is to simplify drivers error handling.
> > + */
> > + refcount_t user_cnt;
> > };
> >
> > struct page *page_pool_alloc_pages(struct page_pool *pool, gfp_t gfp);
> > @@ -134,6 +140,15 @@ static inline void page_pool_free(struct page_pool *pool)
> > #endif
> > }
> >
> > +/* Drivers use this instead of page_pool_free */
> > +static inline void page_pool_destroy(struct page_pool *pool)
> > +{
> > + if (!pool)
> > + return;
> > +
> > + page_pool_free(pool);
> > +}
> > +
> > /* Never call this directly, use helpers below */
> > void __page_pool_put_page(struct page_pool *pool,
> > struct page *page, bool allow_direct);
> > @@ -201,4 +216,14 @@ static inline bool is_page_pool_compiled_in(void)
> > #endif
> > }
> >
> > +static inline void page_pool_get(struct page_pool *pool)
> > +{
> > + refcount_inc(&pool->user_cnt);
> > +}
> > +
> > +static inline bool page_pool_put(struct page_pool *pool)
> > +{
> > + return refcount_dec_and_test(&pool->user_cnt);
> > +}
> > +
> > #endif /* _NET_PAGE_POOL_H */
> > diff --git a/net/core/page_pool.c b/net/core/page_pool.c
> > index b366f59885c1..3272dc7a8c81 100644
> > --- a/net/core/page_pool.c
> > +++ b/net/core/page_pool.c
> > @@ -49,6 +49,9 @@ static int page_pool_init(struct page_pool *pool,
> >
> > atomic_set(&pool->pages_state_release_cnt, 0);
> >
> > + /* Driver calling page_pool_create() also call page_pool_destroy() */
> > + refcount_set(&pool->user_cnt, 1);
> > +
> > if (pool->p.flags & PP_FLAG_DMA_MAP)
> > get_device(pool->p.dev);
> >
> > @@ -70,6 +73,7 @@ struct page_pool *page_pool_create(const struct page_pool_params *params)
> > kfree(pool);
> > return ERR_PTR(err);
> > }
> > +
> > return pool;
> > }
> > EXPORT_SYMBOL(page_pool_create);
> > @@ -356,6 +360,10 @@ static void __warn_in_flight(struct page_pool *pool)
> >
> > void __page_pool_free(struct page_pool *pool)
> > {
> > + /* Only last user actually free/release resources */
> > + if (!page_pool_put(pool))
> > + return;
> > +
> > WARN(pool->alloc.count, "API usage violation");
> > WARN(!ptr_ring_empty(&pool->ring), "ptr_ring is not empty");
> >
> > diff --git a/net/core/xdp.c b/net/core/xdp.c
> > index 829377cc83db..d7bf62ffbb5e 100644
> > --- a/net/core/xdp.c
> > +++ b/net/core/xdp.c
> > @@ -370,6 +370,9 @@ int xdp_rxq_info_reg_mem_model(struct xdp_rxq_info *xdp_rxq,
> > goto err;
> > }
> >
> > + if (type == MEM_TYPE_PAGE_POOL)
> > + page_pool_get(xdp_alloc->page_pool);
> > +
> > mutex_unlock(&mem_id_lock);
> >
> > trace_mem_connect(xdp_alloc, xdp_rxq);
>
>
>
> --
> Best regards,
> Jesper Dangaard Brouer
> MSc.CS, Principal Kernel Engineer at Red Hat
> LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/brouer
Powered by blists - more mailing lists