netdev - Re: [PATCH v7 net-next 5/5] net: ethernet: ti: cpsw: add XDP support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20190705120114.GA3587@khorivan>
Date:   Fri, 5 Jul 2019 15:01:16 +0300
From:   Ivan Khoronzhuk <ivan.khoronzhuk@...aro.org>
To:     Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@...hat.com>
Cc:     grygorii.strashko@...com, davem@...emloft.net, ast@...nel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-omap@...r.kernel.org,
        ilias.apalodimas@...aro.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        daniel@...earbox.net, jakub.kicinski@...ronome.com,
        john.fastabend@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 net-next 5/5] net: ethernet: ti: cpsw: add XDP support

On Fri, Jul 05, 2019 at 01:13:54PM +0200, Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote:
>On Fri,  5 Jul 2019 02:14:06 +0300
>Ivan Khoronzhuk <ivan.khoronzhuk@...aro.org> wrote:
>
>> +static int cpsw_xdp_tx_frame(struct cpsw_priv *priv, struct xdp_frame *xdpf,
>> +			     struct page *page)
>> +{
>> +	struct cpsw_common *cpsw = priv->cpsw;
>> +	struct cpsw_meta_xdp *xmeta;
>> +	struct cpdma_chan *txch;
>> +	dma_addr_t dma;
>> +	int ret, port;
>> +
>> +	xmeta = (void *)xdpf + CPSW_XMETA_OFFSET;
>> +	xmeta->ndev = priv->ndev;
>> +	xmeta->ch = 0;
>> +	txch = cpsw->txv[0].ch;
>> +
>> +	port = priv->emac_port + cpsw->data.dual_emac;
>> +	if (page) {
>> +		dma = page_pool_get_dma_addr(page);
>> +		dma += xdpf->data - (void *)xdpf;
>
>This code is only okay because this only happens for XDP_TX, where you
>know this head-room calculation will be true.  The "correct"
>calculation of the head-room would be:
>
>  dma += xdpf->headroom + sizeof(struct xdp_frame);
>
>The reason behind not using xdpf pointer itself as "data_hard_start",
>is to allow struct xdp_frame to be located in another memory area.

My assumption was based on:

struct xdp_frame *convert_to_xdp_frame(struct xdp_buff *xdp)
{
	...
	xdp_frame = xdp->data_hard_start;
	...

	xdp_frame->headroom = headroom - sizeof(*xdp_frame);
	...
}

But agree, it doesn't contradict the reason in question.
So, better use proposed variant. Will check and do this in v8 a little later:

dma += xdpf->headroom + sizeof(struct xdp_frame);

>This will be useful for e.g. AF_XDP transmit, or other zero-copy
>transmit to go through ndo_xdp_xmit() (as we don't want userspace to
>be-able to e.g. "race" change xdpf->len during transmit/DMA-completion).
>
>
>> +		ret = cpdma_chan_submit_mapped(txch, cpsw_xdpf_to_handle(xdpf),
>> +					       dma, xdpf->len, port);
>> +	} else {
>> +		if (sizeof(*xmeta) > xdpf->headroom) {
>> +			xdp_return_frame_rx_napi(xdpf);
>> +			return -EINVAL;
>> +		}
>> +
>> +		ret = cpdma_chan_submit(txch, cpsw_xdpf_to_handle(xdpf),
>> +					xdpf->data, xdpf->len, port);
>> +	}
>
>
>
>-- 
>Best regards,
>  Jesper Dangaard Brouer
>  MSc.CS, Principal Kernel Engineer at Red Hat
>  LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/brouer

-- 
Regards,
Ivan Khoronzhuk