[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190705123907.1918581f@cakuba.netronome.com>
Date: Fri, 5 Jul 2019 12:39:07 -0700
From: Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@...ronome.com>
To: Sudarsana Reddy Kalluru <skalluru@...vell.com>
Cc: "davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Michal Kalderon <mkalderon@...vell.com>,
"Ariel Elior" <aelior@...vell.com>, Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>
Subject: Re: [EXT] Re: [PATCH net-next v2 4/4] qed*: Add devlink support for
configuration attributes.
On Fri, 5 Jul 2019 08:22:41 +0000, Sudarsana Reddy Kalluru wrote:
> > On Thu, 4 Jul 2019 06:20:11 -0700, Sudarsana Reddy Kalluru wrote:
> > > This patch adds implementation for devlink callbacks for reading and
> > > configuring the device attributes.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Sudarsana Reddy Kalluru <skalluru@...vell.com>
> > > Signed-off-by: Ariel Elior <aelior@...vell.com>
> > > diff --git a/Documentation/networking/devlink-params-qede.txt
> > > b/Documentation/networking/devlink-params-qede.txt
> > > new file mode 100644
> > > index 0000000..f78a993
> > > --- /dev/null
> > > +++ b/Documentation/networking/devlink-params-qede.txt
> > > @@ -0,0 +1,72 @@
> > > +enable_sriov [DEVICE, GENERIC]
> > > + Configuration mode: Permanent
> > > +
> > > +iwarp_cmt [DEVICE, DRIVER-SPECIFIC]
> > > + Enable iWARP support over 100G device (CMT mode).
> > > + Type: Boolean
> > > + Configuration mode: runtime
> > > +
> > > +entity_id [DEVICE, DRIVER-SPECIFIC]
> > > + Set the entity ID value to be used for this device
> > > + while reading/configuring the devlink attributes.
> > > + Type: u8
> > > + Configuration mode: runtime
> >
> > Can you explain what this is?
>
> Hardware/mfw provides the option to modify/read the config of other
> PFs. A non-zero entity id represents a partition number (or simply a
> PF-id) for which the config need to be read/updated.
Having a parameter which changes the interpretation of other parameters
makes me quite uncomfortable :( Could it be a better idea, perhaps, to
use PCI ports? We have been discussing PCI ports for a while now, and
they will probably become a reality soon. You could then hang the
per-PF parameters off of the PF ports rather than the device instance?
> > > +device_capabilities [DEVICE, DRIVER-SPECIFIC]
> > > + Set the entity ID value to be used for this device
> > > + while reading/configuring the devlink attributes.
> > > + Type: u8
> > > + Configuration mode: runtime
> >
> > Looks like you copied the previous text here.
> Will update it, thanks.
>
> >
> > > +mf_mode [DEVICE, DRIVER-SPECIFIC]
> > > + Configure Multi Function mode for the device.
> > > + Supported MF modes and the assoicated values are,
> > > + MF allowed(0), Default(1), SPIO4(2), NPAR1.0(3),
> > > + NPAR1.5(4), NPAR2.0(5), BD(6) and UFP(7)
> >
> > NPAR should have a proper API in devlink port, what are the other modes?
> >
> These are the different modes supported by the Marvell NIC. In our
> case the mf_mode is per adapter basis, e.g., it's not possible to
> configure one port in NPAR mode and the other in Default mode.
Jiri, what are your thoughts on the NPAR support? It is effectively a
PCI split. If we are going to support mdev split, should we perhaps
have a "depth" or "type" of split and allow for users to configure it
using the same API?
> > > + Type: u8
> > > + Configuration mode: Permanent
> > > +
> > > +dcbx_mode [PORT, DRIVER-SPECIFIC]
> > > + Configure DCBX mode for the device.
> > > + Supported dcbx modes are,
> > > + Disabled(0), IEEE(1), CEE(2) and
> > > Dynamic(3)
> > > + Type: u8
> > > + Configuration mode: Permanent
> >
> > Why is this a permanent parameter?
> >
> This specifies the dcbx_mode to be configured in non-volatile memory.
> The value is persistent and is used in the next load of OS or the mfw.
And it can't be changed at runtime?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists