netdev - Re: [PATCH] net: netsec: Sync dma for device on buffer allocation

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 05 Jul 2019 15:42:00 -0700 (PDT)
From:   David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:     ilias.apalodimas@...aro.org
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, jaswinder.singh@...aro.org,
        ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org, arnd@...db.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: netsec: Sync dma for device on buffer allocation

From: Ilias Apalodimas <ilias.apalodimas@...aro.org>
Date: Thu,  4 Jul 2019 17:11:09 +0300

> Quoting Arnd,
> 
> We have to do a sync_single_for_device /somewhere/ before the
> buffer is given to the device. On a non-cache-coherent machine with
> a write-back cache, there may be dirty cache lines that get written back
> after the device DMA's data into it (e.g. from a previous memset
> from before the buffer got freed), so you absolutely need to flush any
> dirty cache lines on it first.
> 
> Since the coherency is configurable in this device make sure we cover
> all configurations by explicitly syncing the allocated buffer for the
> device before refilling it's descriptors
> 
> Signed-off-by: Ilias Apalodimas <ilias.apalodimas@...aro.org>

Please make it explicit in your Subject lines which tree a patch is
for, in this case it should have been "[PATCH net-next] ".

Applied, thanks.