[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20190708.192552.833537119648669033.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Mon, 08 Jul 2019 19:25:52 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: viro@...iv.linux.org.uk
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sockfs: switch to ->free_inode()
From: Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
Date: Fri, 5 Jul 2019 20:13:22 +0100
> we do have an RCU-delayed part there already (freeing the wq),
> so it's not like the pipe situation; moreover, it might be
> worth considering coallocating wq with the rest of struct sock_alloc.
> ->sk_wq in struct sock would remain a pointer as it is, but
> the object it normally points to would be coallocated with
> struct socket...
>
> Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
Applied.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists