netdev - Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the net-next tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20190711132755.0d4f45c9@canb.auug.org.au>
Date:   Thu, 11 Jul 2019 13:27:55 +1000
From:   Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To:     Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...lanox.com>
Cc:     Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org>,
        Bernard Metzler <bmt@...ich.ibm.com>,
        Doug Ledford <dledford@...hat.com>,
        David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Networking <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the net-next tree

Hi all,

On Thu, 11 Jul 2019 13:16:03 +1000 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote:
> 
> On Thu, 11 Jul 2019 13:13:44 +1000 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, 11 Jul 2019 02:26:27 +0000 Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...lanox.com> wrote:  
> > >
> > > On Thu, Jul 11, 2019 at 11:50:54AM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > >     
> > > > So today this failed to build after I merged the rdma tree (previously
> > > > it didn;t until after the net-next tree was merged (I assume a
> > > > dependency changed).  It failed because in_dev_for_each_ifa_rcu (and
> > > > in_dev_for_each_ifa_rtnl) is only defined in a commit in the net-next
> > > > tree :-(      
> > > 
> > > ? I'm confused.. 
> > > 
> > > rdma.git builds fine stand alone (I hope!)    
> > 
> > I have "Fixup to build SIW issue" from Leon (which switches to using
> > in_dev_for_each_ifa_rcu) included in the rmda tree merge commit because
> > without that the rdma tree would not build for me.  Are you saying that
> > I don't need that at all, now?  
> 
> Actually , I get it now, "Fixup to build SIW issue" is really just a
> fixup for the net-next and rdma trees merge ... OK, I will fix that up
> tomorrow.  Sorry for my confusion.

Actually, I have rewound my tree and am starting from the merge of the
rdma tree again, so hopefully it should all be good today.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped