[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190711054003.GA23598@mtr-leonro.mtl.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2019 08:40:03 +0300
From: Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...lanox.com>,
Bernard Metzler <bmt@...ich.ibm.com>,
Doug Ledford <dledford@...hat.com>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Networking <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the net-next tree
On Thu, Jul 11, 2019 at 01:16:03PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> On Thu, 11 Jul 2019 13:13:44 +1000 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, 11 Jul 2019 02:26:27 +0000 Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...lanox.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Thu, Jul 11, 2019 at 11:50:54AM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > >
> > > > So today this failed to build after I merged the rdma tree (previously
> > > > it didn;t until after the net-next tree was merged (I assume a
> > > > dependency changed). It failed because in_dev_for_each_ifa_rcu (and
> > > > in_dev_for_each_ifa_rtnl) is only defined in a commit in the net-next
> > > > tree :-(
> > >
> > > ? I'm confused..
> > >
> > > rdma.git builds fine stand alone (I hope!)
> >
> > I have "Fixup to build SIW issue" from Leon (which switches to using
> > in_dev_for_each_ifa_rcu) included in the rmda tree merge commit because
> > without that the rdma tree would not build for me. Are you saying that
> > I don't need that at all, now?
>
> Actually , I get it now, "Fixup to build SIW issue" is really just a
> fixup for the net-next and rdma trees merge ... OK, I will fix that up
> tomorrow. Sorry for my confusion.
Yes, it was for build only.
>
> --
> Cheers,
> Stephen Rothwell
Powered by blists - more mailing lists