lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <d3d59300-6e94-0d91-e943-02b8ec22c1b4@iogearbox.net>
Date:   Fri, 12 Jul 2019 15:05:43 +0200
From:   Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>
To:     Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@...com>, andrii.nakryiko@...il.com,
        ast@...com, bpf@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        kernel-team@...com
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next] bpf: fix precision bit propagation for BPF_ST
 instructions

On 07/09/2019 05:32 AM, Andrii Nakryiko wrote:
> When backtracking instructions to propagate precision bit for registers
> and stack slots, one class of instructions (BPF_ST) weren't handled
> causing extra stack slots to be propagated into parent state. Parent
> state might not have that much stack allocated, though, which causes
> warning on invalid stack slot usage.
> 
> This patch adds handling of BPF_ST instructions:
> 
> BPF_MEM | <size> | BPF_ST:   *(size *) (dst_reg + off) = imm32
> 
> Reported-by: syzbot+4da3ff23081bafe74fc2@...kaller.appspotmail.com
> Fixes: b5dc0163d8fd ("bpf: precise scalar_value tracking")
> Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...com>
> Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@...com>

Applied, thanks!

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ