lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <42269a37-0353-29c8-ce13-51cb2feeb9af@gmail.com>
Date:   Thu, 18 Jul 2019 10:23:46 -0700
From:   Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
To:     Benjamin Poirier <bpoirier@...e.com>,
        David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc:     Sathya Perla <sathya.perla@...adcom.com>,
        Ajit Khaparde <ajit.khaparde@...adcom.com>,
        Sriharsha Basavapatna <sriharsha.basavapatna@...adcom.com>,
        Somnath Kotur <somnath.kotur@...adcom.com>,
        Firo Yang <fyang@...e.com>,
        Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...lanox.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] be2net: Synchronize be_update_queues with
 dev_watchdog

On 7/17/19 6:42 PM, Benjamin Poirier wrote:
> As pointed out by Firo Yang, a netdev tx timeout may trigger just before an
> ethtool set_channels operation is started. be_tx_timeout(), which dumps
> some queue structures, is not written to run concurrently with
> be_update_queues(), which frees/allocates those queues structures. Add some
> synchronization between the two.
> 
> Message-id: <CH2PR18MB31898E033896F9760D36BFF288C90@...PR18MB3189.namprd18.prod.outlook.com>
> Signed-off-by: Benjamin Poirier <bpoirier@...e.com>

Would not moving the netif_tx_disable() in be_close() further up in the
function resolve that problem as well?
-- 
Florian

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ