[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20190723.133856.860402214064308020.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2019 13:38:56 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: nishkadg.linux@...il.com
Cc: olteanv@...il.com, andrew@...n.ch, vivien.didelot@...il.com,
f.fainelli@...il.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: dsa: sja1105: sja1105_main: Add of_node_put()
From: Nishka Dasgupta <nishkadg.linux@...il.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2019 16:14:48 +0530
> Each iteration of for_each_child_of_node puts the previous node, but in
> the case of a return from the middle of the loop, there is no put, thus
> causing a memory leak. Hence add an of_node_put before the return.
> Issue found with Coccinelle.
>
> Signed-off-by: Nishka Dasgupta <nishkadg.linux@...il.com>
Applied.
Again, the semantics of these looping constructs are terrible.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists