netdev - Re: [PATCH 0/8] can: flexcan: add CAN FD support for NXP Flexcan

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 25 Jul 2019 12:37:05 +0200
From:   Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@...gutronix.de>
To:     Joakim Zhang <qiangqing.zhang@....com>,
        "linux-can@...r.kernel.org" <linux-can@...r.kernel.org>
Cc:     "wg@...ndegger.com" <wg@...ndegger.com>,
        dl-linux-imx <linux-imx@....com>,
        "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/8] can: flexcan: add CAN FD support for NXP Flexcan

On 7/25/19 9:53 AM, Marc Kleine-Budde wrote:
> On 7/25/19 9:38 AM, Joakim Zhang wrote:
>> Kindly pinging...
>>
>> After you git pull request for linux-can-next-for-5.4-20190724, some patches are missing from linux-can-next/testing.
>> can: flexcan: flexcan_mailbox_read() make use of flexcan_write64() to mark the mailbox as read
>> can: flexcan: flexcan_irq(): add support for TX mailbox in iflag1
>> can: flexcan: flexcan_read_reg_iflag_rx(): optimize reading
>> can: flexcan: introduce struct flexcan_priv::tx_mask and make use of it
>> can: flexcan: convert struct flexcan_priv::rx_mask{1,2} to rx_mask
>> can: flexcan: remove TX mailbox bit from struct flexcan_priv::rx_mask{1,2}
>> can: flexcan: rename struct flexcan_priv::reg_imask{1,2}_default to rx_mask{1,2}
>> can: flexcan: flexcan_irq(): rename variable reg_iflag -> reg_iflag_rx
>> can: flexcan: rename macro FLEXCAN_IFLAG_MB() -> FLEXCAN_IFLAG2_MB()
>>
>> You can refer to below link for the reason of adding above patches:
>> https://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-can/msg00777.html
>> https://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-can/msg01150.html
>>
>> Are you prepared to add back these patches as they are necessary for
>> Flexcan CAN FD? And this Flexcan CAN FD patch set is based on these
>> patches.
> 
> Yes, these patches will be added back.

I've cleaned up the first patch a bit, and pushed everything to the
testing branch. Can you give it a test.

regards,
Marc

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                  | Marc Kleine-Budde           |
Industrial Linux Solutions        | Phone: +49-231-2826-924     |
Vertretung West/Dortmund          | Fax:   +49-5121-206917-5555 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686  | http://www.pengutronix.de   |



Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)