netdev - RE: [PATCH 0/8] can: flexcan: add CAN FD support for NXP Flexcan

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <DB7PR04MB46180B39F68030C4EA5E2533E6C00@DB7PR04MB4618.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com>
Date:   Fri, 26 Jul 2019 01:25:47 +0000
From:   Joakim Zhang <qiangqing.zhang@....com>
To:     Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@...gutronix.de>,
        "linux-can@...r.kernel.org" <linux-can@...r.kernel.org>
CC:     "wg@...ndegger.com" <wg@...ndegger.com>,
        dl-linux-imx <linux-imx@....com>,
        "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 0/8] can: flexcan: add CAN FD support for NXP Flexcan


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@...gutronix.de>
> Sent: 2019年7月25日 18:37
> To: Joakim Zhang <qiangqing.zhang@....com>; linux-can@...r.kernel.org
> Cc: wg@...ndegger.com; dl-linux-imx <linux-imx@....com>;
> netdev@...r.kernel.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/8] can: flexcan: add CAN FD support for NXP Flexcan
> 
> On 7/25/19 9:53 AM, Marc Kleine-Budde wrote:
> > On 7/25/19 9:38 AM, Joakim Zhang wrote:
> >> Kindly pinging...
> >>
> >> After you git pull request for linux-can-next-for-5.4-20190724, some patches
> are missing from linux-can-next/testing.
> >> can: flexcan: flexcan_mailbox_read() make use of flexcan_write64() to
> >> mark the mailbox as read
> >> can: flexcan: flexcan_irq(): add support for TX mailbox in iflag1
> >> can: flexcan: flexcan_read_reg_iflag_rx(): optimize reading
> >> can: flexcan: introduce struct flexcan_priv::tx_mask and make use of
> >> it
> >> can: flexcan: convert struct flexcan_priv::rx_mask{1,2} to rx_mask
> >> can: flexcan: remove TX mailbox bit from struct
> >> flexcan_priv::rx_mask{1,2}
> >> can: flexcan: rename struct flexcan_priv::reg_imask{1,2}_default to
> >> rx_mask{1,2}
> >> can: flexcan: flexcan_irq(): rename variable reg_iflag ->
> >> reg_iflag_rx
> >> can: flexcan: rename macro FLEXCAN_IFLAG_MB() ->
> FLEXCAN_IFLAG2_MB()
> >>
> >> You can refer to below link for the reason of adding above patches:
> >> https://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-can/msg00777.html
> >> https://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-can/msg01150.html
> >>
> >> Are you prepared to add back these patches as they are necessary for
> >> Flexcan CAN FD? And this Flexcan CAN FD patch set is based on these
> >> patches.
> >
> > Yes, these patches will be added back.
> 
> I've cleaned up the first patch a bit, and pushed everything to the testing
> branch. Can you give it a test.

Hi Marc,

Both Classic CAN and CAN FD can work fine on my side test, thank you for your kindly review.

Best Regards,
Joakim Zhang
> regards,
> Marc
> 
> --
> Pengutronix e.K.                  | Marc Kleine-Budde           |
> Industrial Linux Solutions        | Phone: +49-231-2826-924     |
> Vertretung West/Dortmund          | Fax:   +49-5121-206917-5555 |
> Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686  | http://www.pengutronix.de   |