netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next] be2net: disable bh with spin_lock in be_process

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CA+FuTSfnqV4zGvW+W0fh+=X-wm8rz1O5ZqGKXpxSVN1vPMD+sw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 30 Jul 2019 10:45:09 -0400
From:   Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@...il.com>
To:     Denis Kirjanov <kda@...ux-powerpc.org>
Cc:     sathya.perla@...adcom.com, ajit.khaparde@...adcom.com,
        sriharsha.basavapatna@...adcom.com,
        Network Development <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        Denis Kirjanov <kdav@...ux-powerpc.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] be2net: disable bh with spin_lock in be_process_mcc

On Tue, Jul 30, 2019 at 7:33 AM Denis Kirjanov <kda@...ux-powerpc.org> wrote:
>
> Signed-off-by: Denis Kirjanov <kdav@...ux-powerpc.org>

This is a partial revert of the previous change to these lines in 2012
in commit 072a9c486004 ("netpoll: revert 6bdb7fe3104 and fix be_poll()
instead").

The commit message is empty. Can you give some context as to why this
is needed and correct?